How prostate cancer patients cope: evaluation and refinement of the Prostate Cancer Patients’ Coping Strategies Questionnaire

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Mens Health Pub Date : 2012-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jomh.2012.01.003
Christopher F. Sharpley PhD , Vicki Bitsika PhD , David R.H. Christie MB, ChB
{"title":"How prostate cancer patients cope: evaluation and refinement of the Prostate Cancer Patients’ Coping Strategies Questionnaire","authors":"Christopher F. Sharpley PhD ,&nbsp;Vicki Bitsika PhD ,&nbsp;David R.H. Christie MB, ChB","doi":"10.1016/j.jomh.2012.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Prostate cancer (PCa) patients suffer from identifiable stressors that may cause them anxiety and/or depression. In a previous study, an initial exploration of the ways in which PCa patients seek to cope with those stressors was described. However, several methodological limitations prevented direct comparisons of the relative effectiveness of patients’ coping strategies. To further investigate this issue, a standardised format was used to present the most commonly-used coping strategies to a new sample of PCa patients and to compare the effectiveness of those strategies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 147 PCa patients completed a background questionnaire and the Prostate Cancer Patients’ Coping Strategies Questionnaire (which includes 16 common stressors experienced by PCa patients plus a list of Coping Strategies for each stressor item).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The most common stressors included physical, emotional, cognitive and relationship aspects of PCa. Although the coping strategies most used were “Just accepted it” and “Exercise/Activity”, these were not the most effective strategies. Data indicated that the strategies that received higher ratings of Overall Clinical Efficacy were either specific to particular stressors, which were clearly defined, or more general to less well-defined stressors. The strategies that were rated as “Very successful” by participants who used them were also a mixture of specific and general responses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PCa patients’ ability to respond effectively to the kinds of stressors they encounter appears to be dependent upon the specificity of the stressor itself, with more general responses being made to stressors that were less specific in their effects upon patients. Implications for assessment of PCa patients’ ability to cope with the stress they experience, and methods of developing individualised coping strategies, are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mens Health","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 70-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jomh.2012.01.003","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mens Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875686712000188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background

Prostate cancer (PCa) patients suffer from identifiable stressors that may cause them anxiety and/or depression. In a previous study, an initial exploration of the ways in which PCa patients seek to cope with those stressors was described. However, several methodological limitations prevented direct comparisons of the relative effectiveness of patients’ coping strategies. To further investigate this issue, a standardised format was used to present the most commonly-used coping strategies to a new sample of PCa patients and to compare the effectiveness of those strategies.

Methods

A total of 147 PCa patients completed a background questionnaire and the Prostate Cancer Patients’ Coping Strategies Questionnaire (which includes 16 common stressors experienced by PCa patients plus a list of Coping Strategies for each stressor item).

Results

The most common stressors included physical, emotional, cognitive and relationship aspects of PCa. Although the coping strategies most used were “Just accepted it” and “Exercise/Activity”, these were not the most effective strategies. Data indicated that the strategies that received higher ratings of Overall Clinical Efficacy were either specific to particular stressors, which were clearly defined, or more general to less well-defined stressors. The strategies that were rated as “Very successful” by participants who used them were also a mixture of specific and general responses.

Conclusion

PCa patients’ ability to respond effectively to the kinds of stressors they encounter appears to be dependent upon the specificity of the stressor itself, with more general responses being made to stressors that were less specific in their effects upon patients. Implications for assessment of PCa patients’ ability to cope with the stress they experience, and methods of developing individualised coping strategies, are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺癌患者如何应对:前列腺癌患者应对策略问卷的评估与完善
前列腺癌(PCa)患者遭受可识别的压力源,可能导致他们焦虑和/或抑郁。在之前的一项研究中,对PCa患者寻求应对这些压力源的方法进行了初步探索。然而,一些方法学上的限制阻碍了对患者应对策略的相对有效性进行直接比较。为了进一步研究这一问题,采用标准化格式向新的PCa患者样本展示最常用的应对策略,并比较这些策略的有效性。方法对147例前列腺癌患者进行背景问卷调查和前列腺癌患者应对策略问卷调查(包括前列腺癌患者常见的16种压力源,以及每种压力源的应对策略)。结果最常见的压力源包括PCa的身体、情绪、认知和关系方面。虽然最常用的应对策略是“接受现实”和“锻炼/活动”,但这些都不是最有效的策略。数据表明,总体临床疗效评分较高的策略要么针对明确定义的特定压力源,要么针对定义不太明确的压力源。被使用这些策略的参与者评为“非常成功”的策略也是具体和一般反应的混合体。结论患者对所遇到的压力源的有效反应能力似乎取决于压力源本身的特异性,对不太特异性的压力源的反应更普遍。本文讨论了评估前列腺癌患者应对压力能力的意义,以及制定个性化应对策略的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mens Health
Journal of Mens Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
28.60%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: JOMH is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. JOMH publishes cutting-edge advances in a wide range of diseases and conditions, including diagnostic procedures, therapeutic management strategies, and innovative clinical research in gender-based biology. It also addresses sexual disparities in health, life expectancy, lifestyle and behaviors and so on. Scientists are encouraged to publish their experimental, theoretical, and descriptive studies and observations in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Exploration of experiences and attitudes associated with lung health promotion among Black males with a history of smoking. Contents Effect of ethanolic extract of Paederia foetida Linn. leaves on sexual behavior and spermatogenesis in male rats Determinants of medical student attitudes to a learning communication skills teaching program Associations between daily sitting time and the combinations of lifestyle risk factors in men
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1