A longitudinal multidimensional analysis of EAP writing: Determining EAP course effectiveness

IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of English for Academic Purposes Pub Date : 2016-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2016.04.005
Peter Crosthwaite
{"title":"A longitudinal multidimensional analysis of EAP writing: Determining EAP course effectiveness","authors":"Peter Crosthwaite","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2016.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While universities devote great effort to initial EAP instruction, many question the effectiveness of such instruction on student production. The present study seeks to determine whether EAP instruction results in a longitudinal linguistic variation in the direction of the established norms of an academic register, which by extension, would provide a quantifiable linguistic measure of EAP course effectiveness. This paper adopts a multidimensional analysis (Biber, 1988) of a longitudinal corpus of written EAP essays and reports totalling 213,408 words, collected from freshman Chinese undergraduate students at a university in Hong Kong. The data was collected over a semester's EAP training at three data points (pre-EAP training, immediate post-training and final written examination). The results of the multidimensional analysis exhibit considerable variation between data points in the direction of academic discourse across all five dimensions analysed, including a drop in the use of first person pronouns and the mechanical use of discourse connectives, alongside an increased emphasis on nominalisation and more careful, hedged, presentation of stance. The findings suggest a warmly positive effect of EAP instruction on learner production after only a single semester. A number of pedagogical opportunities for the data are also outlined including the benefits of such analysis for written corrective feedback and future analysis of discipline-specific L2 discourse.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"22 ","pages":"Pages 166-178"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.04.005","citationCount":"62","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158516300170","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

Abstract

While universities devote great effort to initial EAP instruction, many question the effectiveness of such instruction on student production. The present study seeks to determine whether EAP instruction results in a longitudinal linguistic variation in the direction of the established norms of an academic register, which by extension, would provide a quantifiable linguistic measure of EAP course effectiveness. This paper adopts a multidimensional analysis (Biber, 1988) of a longitudinal corpus of written EAP essays and reports totalling 213,408 words, collected from freshman Chinese undergraduate students at a university in Hong Kong. The data was collected over a semester's EAP training at three data points (pre-EAP training, immediate post-training and final written examination). The results of the multidimensional analysis exhibit considerable variation between data points in the direction of academic discourse across all five dimensions analysed, including a drop in the use of first person pronouns and the mechanical use of discourse connectives, alongside an increased emphasis on nominalisation and more careful, hedged, presentation of stance. The findings suggest a warmly positive effect of EAP instruction on learner production after only a single semester. A number of pedagogical opportunities for the data are also outlined including the benefits of such analysis for written corrective feedback and future analysis of discipline-specific L2 discourse.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EAP写作的纵向多维分析:确定EAP课程的有效性
虽然大学在EAP的初始教学上投入了很大的精力,但许多人质疑这种教学对学生生产的有效性。本研究旨在确定EAP教学是否会导致学术注册规范方向上的纵向语言变化,进而为EAP课程的有效性提供可量化的语言衡量标准。本文采用多维度分析方法(Biber, 1988),对香港一所大学一年级中国本科生撰写的EAP论文和报告纵向语料库进行分析,该语料库共213408字。数据收集于一个学期EAP培训的三个数据点(EAP培训前、培训后和期末笔试)。多维度分析的结果显示,在分析的所有五个维度上,学术话语方向的数据点之间存在相当大的差异,包括第一人称代词的使用减少,话语连接词的机械使用,以及对名词化的强调增加,立场的表达更加谨慎、模糊。研究结果表明,EAP教学仅在一个学期后就对学习者的学习成果产生了积极的影响。本文还概述了数据的一些教学机会,包括这种分析对书面纠正反馈的好处,以及对特定学科的第二语言话语的未来分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of English for Academic Purposes provides a forum for the dissemination of information and views which enables practitioners of and researchers in EAP to keep current with developments in their field and to contribute to its continued updating. JEAP publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges in the linguistic, sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic description of English as it occurs in the contexts of academic study and scholarly exchange itself.
期刊最新文献
Diachronic change of noun phrase complexity in the IMRD sections of medical research articles (1970–2020) Lexical bundles across IMRD-structured Medicine research article sections: A within-register perspective Local grammar, discourse acts, and disciplinarity: A case study of definition Integrative genre-based pedagogy: Enhancing social responsiveness in English medium of instruction and STEM education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1