L Noteboom, E Kemler, A M C van Beijsterveldt, M J M Hoozemans, F C T van der Helm, E A L M Verhagen
{"title":"Factors associated with gym-based fitness injuries: A case-control study.","authors":"L Noteboom, E Kemler, A M C van Beijsterveldt, M J M Hoozemans, F C T van der Helm, E A L M Verhagen","doi":"10.1016/j.jsampl.2023.100032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A large number of sports injuries are sustained during gym-based fitness activities. As a first step towards prevention, the objective of the present study was to identify factors associated with fitness injuries.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective case-control study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>493 fitness participants that sustained a fitness injury in the past year (cases) were compared to 971 fitness participants that did not sustain a fitness injury (controls), regarding their characteristics and their exposure to gym-based fitness activities, other sports, and work. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with fitness injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Males were 1.7 times (95% CI [1.4, 2.1]) more likely than females to have sustained an injury (univariate Odds Ratio). Identified injury associated factors from the final prediction model for males included: age below 41, 7+ months fitness experience, performing fitness mainly outdoors or indoors (vs. at-home), and combining 5+ times fitness per month with full-time work. The goodness of fit of the final model for males was sufficient (Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.73), while the final model for females had a poor fit (AUC = 0.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Young males were more associated with fitness injuries, potentially due to different 'risk-taking' behavior or training intensity compared to elder people and females. Results suggest that factors outside of fitness, like work, may contribute to injury occurrence and should be considered when designing a training schedule to prevent overall (physical and mental) overload. Furthermore, at-home fitness was associated with fewer injuries compared to indoor or outdoor fitness. Future longitudinal research is needed to identify cause-effect relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":74029,"journal":{"name":"JSAMS plus","volume":"1 1","pages":"100032"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13008432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSAMS plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsampl.2023.100032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: A large number of sports injuries are sustained during gym-based fitness activities. As a first step towards prevention, the objective of the present study was to identify factors associated with fitness injuries.
Design: Retrospective case-control study.
Methods: 493 fitness participants that sustained a fitness injury in the past year (cases) were compared to 971 fitness participants that did not sustain a fitness injury (controls), regarding their characteristics and their exposure to gym-based fitness activities, other sports, and work. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with fitness injuries.
Results: Males were 1.7 times (95% CI [1.4, 2.1]) more likely than females to have sustained an injury (univariate Odds Ratio). Identified injury associated factors from the final prediction model for males included: age below 41, 7+ months fitness experience, performing fitness mainly outdoors or indoors (vs. at-home), and combining 5+ times fitness per month with full-time work. The goodness of fit of the final model for males was sufficient (Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.73), while the final model for females had a poor fit (AUC = 0.6).
Conclusions: Young males were more associated with fitness injuries, potentially due to different 'risk-taking' behavior or training intensity compared to elder people and females. Results suggest that factors outside of fitness, like work, may contribute to injury occurrence and should be considered when designing a training schedule to prevent overall (physical and mental) overload. Furthermore, at-home fitness was associated with fewer injuries compared to indoor or outdoor fitness. Future longitudinal research is needed to identify cause-effect relationships.