MEXICAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AGAINST CORRUPTION: SCOPE AND FUTURE

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW Mexican Law Review Pub Date : 2015-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mexlaw.2015.12.004
Daniel Márquez
{"title":"MEXICAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AGAINST CORRUPTION: SCOPE AND FUTURE","authors":"Daniel Márquez","doi":"10.1016/j.mexlaw.2015.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This work gives a synopsis of the evolution of public administration control mechanisms in Mexico. It highlights the instrumental nature of oversight, as well as regulatory and assessment aspects, and discusses issues like the historical design of the control instruments used in Mexican public administration. Certain social and political aspects from a legal perspective of administrative anti-corruption regulations are then underscored. The article concludes by drawing attention to the fact that neither the newly designed political-administrative anti-corruption structure in Mexico (the National Anti-Corruption Commission) nor the new mechanism to emerge from draft legislation (the National Anti-Corruption and Oversight Institute) will not eliminate corruption in the country because they replicate the same model established for reforming legal institutions. This article aims to show how the Mexican model has repeatedly designed administrative rules and structures that are unable to rise above the political and social spheres in which the complex phenomenon of corruption is deeply entrenched and creates a schism between legislative development and Mexico's social-political experiences in its fight against corruption. These observations can serve to help other countries design anti-corruption instruments. China is cited in this article because this article was presented as a speech regarding the Mexican experience in that country. It should be noted that the intention of this study was not to make a comparison of corruption or of the legal structures in these countries, but to analyze the case of Mexico.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41684,"journal":{"name":"Mexican Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mexlaw.2015.12.004","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mexican Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1870057815000050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This work gives a synopsis of the evolution of public administration control mechanisms in Mexico. It highlights the instrumental nature of oversight, as well as regulatory and assessment aspects, and discusses issues like the historical design of the control instruments used in Mexican public administration. Certain social and political aspects from a legal perspective of administrative anti-corruption regulations are then underscored. The article concludes by drawing attention to the fact that neither the newly designed political-administrative anti-corruption structure in Mexico (the National Anti-Corruption Commission) nor the new mechanism to emerge from draft legislation (the National Anti-Corruption and Oversight Institute) will not eliminate corruption in the country because they replicate the same model established for reforming legal institutions. This article aims to show how the Mexican model has repeatedly designed administrative rules and structures that are unable to rise above the political and social spheres in which the complex phenomenon of corruption is deeply entrenched and creates a schism between legislative development and Mexico's social-political experiences in its fight against corruption. These observations can serve to help other countries design anti-corruption instruments. China is cited in this article because this article was presented as a speech regarding the Mexican experience in that country. It should be noted that the intention of this study was not to make a comparison of corruption or of the legal structures in these countries, but to analyze the case of Mexico.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥反腐败行政法:范围与未来
这项工作概述了墨西哥公共行政控制机制的演变。它突出了监督的工具性质,以及管理和评估方面,并讨论了墨西哥公共行政中使用的管制工具的历史设计等问题。然后从法律角度强调行政反腐败法规的某些社会和政治方面。文章最后提请注意这样一个事实,即墨西哥新设计的政治行政反腐败结构(国家反腐败委员会)和立法草案中出现的新机制(国家反腐败和监督研究所)都不会消除该国的腐败,因为它们复制了为改革法律机构而建立的相同模式。本文旨在展示墨西哥模式如何一再设计行政规则和结构,而这些规则和结构无法超越政治和社会领域,在这些领域中,复杂的腐败现象根深蒂固,并在立法发展与墨西哥打击腐败的社会政治经验之间造成分裂。这些观察结果可以帮助其他国家设计反腐败工具。本文之所以引用中国,是因为这篇文章是以墨西哥在中国的经验为主题的演讲。应当指出,这项研究的目的不是比较这些国家的腐败或法律结构,而是分析墨西哥的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards an evidence-based pretrial risk assessment in Mexican juvenile offenders: A systematic review of relevant instruments using COSMIN guidelines review of the legal tax framework for digital platforms in Mexico Mexican State’s interpretation of indigenous self-determination in the age of democracy (1992-2022) influence of feminist mobilization on legal consciousness and the practices of femicide prosecutors in Mexico at the subnational level characteristics of Russian and Mexican environmental taxation systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1