Assessing laser powder bed fusion system geometric errors through artifact-based methods

J. Berez , M. Praniewicz , C. Saldana
{"title":"Assessing laser powder bed fusion system geometric errors through artifact-based methods","authors":"J. Berez ,&nbsp;M. Praniewicz ,&nbsp;C. Saldana","doi":"10.1016/j.promfg.2021.06.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Additive manufacturing (AM) machines have developed more rapidly than standardized frameworks needed for the qualification of their geometric capabilities. While some manufacturer-specific methods exist to test capabilities and perform some calibration tasks, standardization efforts have only recently been undertaken in the form of ISO/ASTM 52902. In this study, the recommended methodology prescribed by the standard was implemented by building geometric artifacts with a laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) system and performing dimensional inspection with a coordinate measurement machine (CMM), amongst other methods. Typical dimensional capabilities of the LPBF system are identified and commentary is made on applying metrology methods, detecting geometric error, and diagnosing base causes in the LPBF system. In doing so, favored metrology practices and measurement analysis methods auxiliary to the standard are proposed. Artifact measurements were used to characterize beam positioning error and beam offset error. Methods for decoupling the effects of error sources are proposed. Difficulties in the inspection of AM components are identified, and the effects of various CMM measurement strategies are evaluated. Insights on the application of the new standard are presented, along with commentary as to its fitness for the LPBF process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91947,"journal":{"name":"Procedia manufacturing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.06.042","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978921000494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) machines have developed more rapidly than standardized frameworks needed for the qualification of their geometric capabilities. While some manufacturer-specific methods exist to test capabilities and perform some calibration tasks, standardization efforts have only recently been undertaken in the form of ISO/ASTM 52902. In this study, the recommended methodology prescribed by the standard was implemented by building geometric artifacts with a laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) system and performing dimensional inspection with a coordinate measurement machine (CMM), amongst other methods. Typical dimensional capabilities of the LPBF system are identified and commentary is made on applying metrology methods, detecting geometric error, and diagnosing base causes in the LPBF system. In doing so, favored metrology practices and measurement analysis methods auxiliary to the standard are proposed. Artifact measurements were used to characterize beam positioning error and beam offset error. Methods for decoupling the effects of error sources are proposed. Difficulties in the inspection of AM components are identified, and the effects of various CMM measurement strategies are evaluated. Insights on the application of the new standard are presented, along with commentary as to its fitness for the LPBF process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于伪影的激光粉末床融合系统几何误差评估方法
增材制造(AM)机器的发展速度比其几何能力资格所需的标准化框架更快。虽然存在一些制造商特定的方法来测试能力并执行一些校准任务,但标准化工作直到最近才以ISO/ASTM 52902的形式进行。在本研究中,通过使用激光粉末床熔合(LPBF)系统构建几何工件和使用坐标测量机(CMM)进行尺寸检查等方法,实现了标准规定的推荐方法。对LPBF系统的典型量纲能力进行了识别,并对LPBF系统中计量方法的应用、几何误差的检测和基本原因的诊断进行了评述。在此过程中,提出了有利的计量实践和辅助标准的测量分析方法。伪影测量用于表征波束定位误差和波束偏移误差。提出了解耦误差源影响的方法。指出了增材制造部件检测中的难点,并对各种三坐标测量机测量策略的效果进行了评价。提出了对新标准应用的见解,以及对其是否适合LPBF过程的评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reconfigurable Antenna for Wi-Fi and 5G Applications Preface Implementing Digitalised Lean Manufacturing Training in a UK Engine Manufacturing Centre During the SARS-CoV2 Pandemic of 2020 Lean industry 4.0: a digital value stream approach to process improvement An approach to airline MRO operators planning and scheduling during aircraft line maintenance checks using discrete event simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1