A nested framework for transparency in Public Private Partnerships: Case studies in highway development projects in India

IF 5 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Progress in Planning Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.progress.2015.02.001
Chandrima Mukhopadhyay
{"title":"A nested framework for transparency in Public Private Partnerships: Case studies in highway development projects in India","authors":"Chandrima Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.1016/j.progress.2015.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Public Private Partnership (PPP) offers an innovative framework of accountability in comparison to traditional public sector procurement model. Transparency is one of the four components of the framework. Whereas theoretically PPP calls for restricted transparency, policy makers have recently raised their voices for improved transparency of public infrastructure delivery process throughout the project cycle. But the question arises what transparency is and what does it do? This research offers a framework of transparency to understand the wider concept both in depth and breadth, drawing on the literature of decision-making in mega projects, PPP and understanding of transparency under various theoretical paradigms. Three highway projects from the eastern part of India are examined and conclusions are also based on case study findings, considering the extent they can be framed under various theoretical paradigms under review. </span><span>Hood and Heald's (2006)</span> framework on categories of transparency based on time and direction of disclosure of information is also used to suggest how altering time and direction of disclosure would have better served the purposes of transparency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47399,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Planning","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 1-36"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.progress.2015.02.001","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Planning","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305900615000240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Public Private Partnership (PPP) offers an innovative framework of accountability in comparison to traditional public sector procurement model. Transparency is one of the four components of the framework. Whereas theoretically PPP calls for restricted transparency, policy makers have recently raised their voices for improved transparency of public infrastructure delivery process throughout the project cycle. But the question arises what transparency is and what does it do? This research offers a framework of transparency to understand the wider concept both in depth and breadth, drawing on the literature of decision-making in mega projects, PPP and understanding of transparency under various theoretical paradigms. Three highway projects from the eastern part of India are examined and conclusions are also based on case study findings, considering the extent they can be framed under various theoretical paradigms under review. Hood and Heald's (2006) framework on categories of transparency based on time and direction of disclosure of information is also used to suggest how altering time and direction of disclosure would have better served the purposes of transparency.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公私伙伴关系透明度的嵌套框架:印度高速公路发展项目案例研究
与传统的公共部门采购模式相比,公私伙伴关系(PPP)提供了一个创新的问责框架。透明度是该框架的四个组成部分之一。虽然从理论上讲,PPP要求有限的透明度,但政策制定者最近提高了他们的声音,要求在整个项目周期内提高公共基础设施交付过程的透明度。但是问题来了,透明是什么,它有什么作用?本研究借鉴了有关大型项目决策、PPP和各种理论范式下对透明度的理解的文献,提供了一个透明度的框架,以便从深度和广度上理解更广泛的概念。本文考察了印度东部的三个高速公路项目,考虑到它们可以在审查中的各种理论范式下框架的程度,结论也是基于案例研究的结果。Hood and Heald(2006)关于基于信息披露的时间和方向的透明度类别的框架也被用来表明改变披露的时间和方向如何更好地服务于透明度的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
A Comparative Techno-Economic and Lifecycle Analysis of Biomass-Derived Anode Materials for Lithium- and Sodium-Ion Batteries
IF 7.1 3区 材料科学Advanced Sustainable SystemsPub Date : 2022-04-11 DOI: 10.1002/adsu.202200047
Federico Trotta, George Jing Wang, Zhenyu Guo, Zhen Xu, Maria Crespo Ribadeneyra, Heather Au, Jacqueline Sophie Edge, Maria Magdalena Titirici, Laura Lander
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
1.60%
发文量
26
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Planning is a multidisciplinary journal of research monographs offering a convenient and rapid outlet for extended papers in the field of spatial and environmental planning. Each issue comprises a single monograph of between 25,000 and 35,000 words. The journal is fully peer reviewed, has a global readership, and has been in publication since 1972.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Cultural pluralism and inclusive urban revitalisation: The experience of Dandenong, Melbourne Editorial Board How is urban agriculture practiced, institutionalized, implemented, and sustained? A literature review Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1