{"title":"Extending the two-component model of delusion to substance use disorder etiology and recovery","authors":"George B. Richardson , Nathan McGee","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The brain disease model (BMDA) and psychosocial models of addiction attend to phenomena at different levels of biological organization, and evidence suggests neither is sufficient to explain substance use disorder (SUD). Here, we extend a Bayesian model of the emergence and persistence of delusions to SUD etiology and recovery, building upon efforts to link lower-level impacts of psychoactive compounds to higher-level phenomena such as attitudes, beliefs, and self-control. According to the resulting two-component model of SUD, psychoactive substances interact with genetic and environmental factors to produce delusions about the biological importance of substance use and its contexts by perturbating basic human affective systems. These delusions are most often revised or rejected based on individuals’ existing belief systems. But in some individuals, factors explaining the persistence of an array of delusions (e.g., lower levels of executive functioning) prevent the evaluation and revision system from rejecting or revising beliefs that attribute high salience to substance-related stimuli. This theory provides novel hypotheses regarding the potential roles of factors such as dichotomous thinking, positive illusions and self-deception, and denial or lack of awareness in SUD etiology and recovery. Furthermore, it provides an account of SUD that may result in less stigma than the BDMA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X22000058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The brain disease model (BMDA) and psychosocial models of addiction attend to phenomena at different levels of biological organization, and evidence suggests neither is sufficient to explain substance use disorder (SUD). Here, we extend a Bayesian model of the emergence and persistence of delusions to SUD etiology and recovery, building upon efforts to link lower-level impacts of psychoactive compounds to higher-level phenomena such as attitudes, beliefs, and self-control. According to the resulting two-component model of SUD, psychoactive substances interact with genetic and environmental factors to produce delusions about the biological importance of substance use and its contexts by perturbating basic human affective systems. These delusions are most often revised or rejected based on individuals’ existing belief systems. But in some individuals, factors explaining the persistence of an array of delusions (e.g., lower levels of executive functioning) prevent the evaluation and revision system from rejecting or revising beliefs that attribute high salience to substance-related stimuli. This theory provides novel hypotheses regarding the potential roles of factors such as dichotomous thinking, positive illusions and self-deception, and denial or lack of awareness in SUD etiology and recovery. Furthermore, it provides an account of SUD that may result in less stigma than the BDMA.
期刊介绍:
New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.