Bayesian predictive inference under a Dirichlet process with sensitivity to the normal baseline

Q Mathematics Statistical Methodology Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.stamet.2015.07.003
Balgobin Nandram, Jiani Yin
{"title":"Bayesian predictive inference under a Dirichlet process with sensitivity to the normal baseline","authors":"Balgobin Nandram,&nbsp;Jiani Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.stamet.2015.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is well known that the Dirichlet process (DP) model and Dirichlet process mixture (DPM) model are sensitive to the specifications of the baseline distribution. Given a sample from a finite population, we perform Bayesian predictive inference about a finite population quantity (e.g., mean) using a DP model. Generally, in many applications a normal distribution is used for the baseline distribution. Therefore, our main objective is empirical and we show the extent of the sensitivity of inference about the finite population mean with respect to six distributions (normal, lognormal, gamma, inverse Gaussian, a two-component normal mixture and a skewed normal). We have compared the DP model using these baselines with the Polya posterior (fully nonparametric) and the Bayesian bootstrap (sampling with a Haldane prior). We used two examples, one on income data and the other on body mass index data, to compare the performance of these three procedures. These examples show some differences among the six baseline distributions, the Polya posterior and the Bayesian bootstrap, indicating that the normal baseline model cannot be used automatically. Therefore, we consider a simulation study to assess this issue further, and we show how to solve this problem using a leave-one-out kernel baseline. Because the leave-one-out kernel baseline cannot be easily applied to the DPM, we show theoretically how one can solve the sensitivity problem for the DPM as well.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48877,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.stamet.2015.07.003","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572312715000520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

It is well known that the Dirichlet process (DP) model and Dirichlet process mixture (DPM) model are sensitive to the specifications of the baseline distribution. Given a sample from a finite population, we perform Bayesian predictive inference about a finite population quantity (e.g., mean) using a DP model. Generally, in many applications a normal distribution is used for the baseline distribution. Therefore, our main objective is empirical and we show the extent of the sensitivity of inference about the finite population mean with respect to six distributions (normal, lognormal, gamma, inverse Gaussian, a two-component normal mixture and a skewed normal). We have compared the DP model using these baselines with the Polya posterior (fully nonparametric) and the Bayesian bootstrap (sampling with a Haldane prior). We used two examples, one on income data and the other on body mass index data, to compare the performance of these three procedures. These examples show some differences among the six baseline distributions, the Polya posterior and the Bayesian bootstrap, indicating that the normal baseline model cannot be used automatically. Therefore, we consider a simulation study to assess this issue further, and we show how to solve this problem using a leave-one-out kernel baseline. Because the leave-one-out kernel baseline cannot be easily applied to the DPM, we show theoretically how one can solve the sensitivity problem for the DPM as well.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dirichlet过程下对正基线敏感的贝叶斯预测推理
众所周知,Dirichlet过程(DP)模型和Dirichlet过程混合(DPM)模型对基线分布的规格很敏感。给定来自有限总体的样本,我们使用DP模型对有限总体数量(例如,平均值)执行贝叶斯预测推断。通常,在许多应用程序中,正态分布用于基线分布。因此,我们的主要目标是经验的,我们展示了关于六个分布(正态,对数正态,伽马,逆高斯,双分量正态混合和偏斜正态)的有限总体均值推理的敏感性程度。我们将使用这些基线的DP模型与Polya后验(完全非参数)和贝叶斯bootstrap(使用Haldane先验抽样)进行了比较。我们用两个例子,一个是收入数据,另一个是身体质量指数数据,来比较这三种方法的效果。这些例子显示了六种基线分布、Polya后验和贝叶斯bootstrap之间的一些差异,表明正常基线模型不能自动使用。因此,我们考虑一个模拟研究来进一步评估这个问题,我们展示了如何使用留一个内核基线来解决这个问题。由于“留一”核基线不能很容易地应用于DPM,因此我们从理论上说明如何解决DPM的灵敏度问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Methodology
Statistical Methodology STATISTICS & PROBABILITY-
CiteScore
0.59
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Statistical Methodology aims to publish articles of high quality reflecting the varied facets of contemporary statistical theory as well as of significant applications. In addition to helping to stimulate research, the journal intends to bring about interactions among statisticians and scientists in other disciplines broadly interested in statistical methodology. The journal focuses on traditional areas such as statistical inference, multivariate analysis, design of experiments, sampling theory, regression analysis, re-sampling methods, time series, nonparametric statistics, etc., and also gives special emphasis to established as well as emerging applied areas.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Nonparametric M-estimation for right censored regression model with stationary ergodic data Symmetric directional false discovery rate control Estimation and goodness-of-fit in latent trait models: A comparison among theoretical approaches Some new results on the Rényi quantile entropy Ordering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1