Efficacia dell’antibiotico-terapia locale in aggiunta alla terapia meccanica non chirurgica parodontale: studio sperimentale split-mouth

L. Fulvi, E. Polizzi, A. Calderini
{"title":"Efficacia dell’antibiotico-terapia locale in aggiunta alla terapia meccanica non chirurgica parodontale: studio sperimentale split-mouth","authors":"L. Fulvi,&nbsp;E. Polizzi,&nbsp;A. Calderini","doi":"10.1016/j.pad.2010.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the effectiveness of local antibiotic therapy with sodium piperacillin plus scaling/root-planing (SRP) versus scaling and root-planing with local application of chlorhexidine for treating periodontal pockets in selected patients with chronic generalized periodontitis.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We conducted an experimental split-mouth study of 20 patients with chronic generalized periodontitis (probing pocket depth [PPD] ≥5<!--> <!-->mm). Each oral cavity was divided into two sectors: the first was treated with SRP plus local application of sodium piperacillin and the second with SRP plus local application of chlorhexidine gel. The PPD and bleeding on probing (BOP) indexes were checked at baseline (time 0) and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment, and the data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Analysis of PPD and BOP indexes recorded before, during, and after treatment revealed no statistically significant differences between the two therapeutic approaches tested (SRP<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->sodium piperacillin vs SRP<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->chlorhexidine).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Within the limits of this study, sodium piperacillin and chlorhexidine appear to be equally effective for use during SRP for the treatment of moderate-severe chronic generalized periodontitis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77593,"journal":{"name":"Prevenzione & assistenza dentale","volume":"37 2","pages":"Pages 33-36, 39-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pad.2010.12.002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevenzione & assistenza dentale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0393996011000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of local antibiotic therapy with sodium piperacillin plus scaling/root-planing (SRP) versus scaling and root-planing with local application of chlorhexidine for treating periodontal pockets in selected patients with chronic generalized periodontitis.

Materials and methods

We conducted an experimental split-mouth study of 20 patients with chronic generalized periodontitis (probing pocket depth [PPD] ≥5 mm). Each oral cavity was divided into two sectors: the first was treated with SRP plus local application of sodium piperacillin and the second with SRP plus local application of chlorhexidine gel. The PPD and bleeding on probing (BOP) indexes were checked at baseline (time 0) and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment, and the data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis.

Results

Analysis of PPD and BOP indexes recorded before, during, and after treatment revealed no statistically significant differences between the two therapeutic approaches tested (SRP + sodium piperacillin vs SRP + chlorhexidine).

Conclusions

Within the limits of this study, sodium piperacillin and chlorhexidine appear to be equally effective for use during SRP for the treatment of moderate-severe chronic generalized periodontitis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部抗生素治疗在牙科机械非手术治疗之外的有效性:切片嘴实验研究
目的评价哌拉西林钠局部抗生素治疗加刮治/刨根(SRP)与局部应用氯己定刮治和刨根治疗慢性广泛性牙周炎患者牙周袋的疗效。材料与方法对20例慢性广泛性牙周炎(探诊袋深度[PPD]≥5 mm)患者进行实验性口裂研究。每个口腔分为两部分:第一部分用SRP加局部应用哌拉西林钠,第二部分用SRP加局部应用氯己定凝胶。分别于基线(时间0)及治疗后1、3、6个月检查PPD、探查出血(BOP)指标,并对所得数据进行统计分析。结果分析两种治疗方法(SRP +哌西林钠与SRP +氯己定)治疗前、治疗中、治疗后的PPD和BOP指标,差异无统计学意义。结论:在本研究范围内,在SRP期间使用哌拉西林钠和氯己定治疗中重度慢性广泛性牙周炎似乎同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Billing]. [Contact dermatitis]. Editorial board Prevenzione della carie: ruolo dell’alimentazione e della fluoroprofilassi Prevenzione e igiene orale in pazienti in terapia ortodontico-chirurgica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1