Comparativa entre Screening Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-S) y Minimental State Examination (MMSE) en psiquiatría forense. Estudio piloto

Q3 Medicine Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.reml.2022.01.001

Priscila Caballero Casanoves , César Jesús Correas Soto , Óscar Pino López , Judith Prió Silvestre

{"title":"Comparativa entre Screening Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-S) y Minimental State Examination (MMSE) en psiquiatría forense. Estudio piloto","authors":"Priscila Caballero Casanoves , César Jesús Correas Soto , Óscar Pino López , Judith Prió Silvestre","doi":"10.1016/j.reml.2022.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective is to compare two brief cognitive screening tests, MMSE and SCIP-S, and determine their usefulness in assessing the cognitive status of subjects diagnosed with psychiatric pathology.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Pilot study of a series of 33 cases from the Institutes of Legal Medicine of Catalonia and Andorra, whose inclusion criterion was the existence of a psychiatric pathology categorized in ICD-10. In all cases, in addition, to the forensic medical interview, MMSE was administered followed by SCIP-S.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In MMSE, 31 of the 33 interviewees obtained a total direct score ≥ 24 (normal cognitive performance). In SCIP-S, only 5 of the 33 participants were in a percentile ≥15 (normal cognitive performance). The difference between the results of both tests was statistically significant (p<0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study suggests a greater usefulness of SCIP-S compared to MMSE in detecting cognitive deficits in psychiatric patients. Therefore, the use of the former is recommended in forensic medical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35705,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal","volume":"48 3","pages":"Pages 92-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377473222000025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives

The objective is to compare two brief cognitive screening tests, MMSE and SCIP-S, and determine their usefulness in assessing the cognitive status of subjects diagnosed with psychiatric pathology.

Material and methods

Pilot study of a series of 33 cases from the Institutes of Legal Medicine of Catalonia and Andorra, whose inclusion criterion was the existence of a psychiatric pathology categorized in ICD-10. In all cases, in addition, to the forensic medical interview, MMSE was administered followed by SCIP-S.

Results

In MMSE, 31 of the 33 interviewees obtained a total direct score ≥ 24 (normal cognitive performance). In SCIP-S, only 5 of the 33 participants were in a percentile ≥ 15 (normal cognitive performance). The difference between the results of both tests was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

This study suggests a greater usefulness of SCIP-S compared to MMSE in detecting cognitive deficits in psychiatric patients. Therefore, the use of the former is recommended in forensic medical practice.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

比较中心筛选精神病学认知障碍(SCIP-S)通过最低状态检查(MMSE)在psiquiatría法医。工厂化piloto

目的比较MMSE和SCIP-S两种简短的认知筛查测试，并确定它们在评估被诊断为精神病理的受试者的认知状态方面的有用性。材料和方法对来自加泰罗尼亚和安道尔法律医学研究所的一系列33例病例进行研究，其纳入标准是存在ICD-10分类的精神病理。在所有情况下，除了法医面谈外，还进行了MMSE，然后进行了SCIP-S。结果在MMSE测试中，有31人的直接总分≥24分(正常认知能力)。在SCIP-S中，33名参与者中只有5人的百分位数≥15(正常认知表现)。两项试验结果的差异有统计学意义(p <0.05)。结论与MMSE相比，SCIP-S在检测精神病患者认知缺陷方面更有用。因此，建议在法医实践中使用前者。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊