Daily disposable hydrogel contact lenses: a comparative study

James C. Bigham OD , Bradley A. Byergo OD , Vinita Allee Henry OD
{"title":"Daily disposable hydrogel contact lenses: a comparative study","authors":"James C. Bigham OD ,&nbsp;Bradley A. Byergo OD ,&nbsp;Vinita Allee Henry OD","doi":"10.1016/S0892-8967(02)00079-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This open-label study compares three daily disposable hydrogel contact lenses, Focus® Dailies® (Ciba Vision), 1-Day Acuvue® (Vistakon, a division of Johnson &amp; Johnson), and SofLens® one day disposable (Bausch &amp; Lomb). Comparisons were made by soliciting participant preference among factors such as overall satisfaction, comfort, satisfaction with vision, dryness, eye strain, ease of handling, irritation upon insertion, frequency of solution use, and rate of damage of contact lenses. Subjects were randomly given appropriate Focus® Dailies®, 1-Day Acuvue®, and SofLens® one day disposable to use on both eyes for 2-week periods. After use of each of the three lens designs, the participants filled out a questionnaire about their wearing experience and their eyes were evaluated for contact lens complications. They also filled out a final questionnaire. Fifty percent of the participants favored Focus® Dailies® in a forced-choice comparison although 1-Day Acuvue® and SofLens® one day disposable scored higher in overall satisfaction. We find that participant preference appears to be influenced by factors other than performance on the eye. Factors such as packaging (easy to open) and lens designs that enhance handling strongly influence patient lens preference.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80286,"journal":{"name":"International contact lens clinic (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"27 4","pages":"Pages 124-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0892-8967(02)00079-2","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International contact lens clinic (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892896702000792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This open-label study compares three daily disposable hydrogel contact lenses, Focus® Dailies® (Ciba Vision), 1-Day Acuvue® (Vistakon, a division of Johnson & Johnson), and SofLens® one day disposable (Bausch & Lomb). Comparisons were made by soliciting participant preference among factors such as overall satisfaction, comfort, satisfaction with vision, dryness, eye strain, ease of handling, irritation upon insertion, frequency of solution use, and rate of damage of contact lenses. Subjects were randomly given appropriate Focus® Dailies®, 1-Day Acuvue®, and SofLens® one day disposable to use on both eyes for 2-week periods. After use of each of the three lens designs, the participants filled out a questionnaire about their wearing experience and their eyes were evaluated for contact lens complications. They also filled out a final questionnaire. Fifty percent of the participants favored Focus® Dailies® in a forced-choice comparison although 1-Day Acuvue® and SofLens® one day disposable scored higher in overall satisfaction. We find that participant preference appears to be influenced by factors other than performance on the eye. Factors such as packaging (easy to open) and lens designs that enhance handling strongly influence patient lens preference.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日用一次性水凝胶隐形眼镜的比较研究
这项开放标签研究比较了三种日用一次性水凝胶隐形眼镜,Focus®Dailies®(Ciba Vision), 1-Day Acuvue®(Vistakon,强生公司旗下子公司);和SofLens®一天一次性用品(Bausch &随着)。通过询问参与者对以下因素的偏好进行比较:总体满意度、舒适度、视力满意度、干涩程度、眼睛疲劳程度、操作难易程度、插入时的刺激程度、使用溶液的频率和隐形眼镜的损坏率。受试者被随机给予适当的Focus®Dailies®、1-Day Acuvue®和SofLens®一天一次性使用,为期2周。在使用了三种设计的隐形眼镜后,参与者填写了一份关于他们佩戴体验的问卷,并对他们的眼睛进行了隐形眼镜并发症的评估。他们还填写了最后一份问卷。尽管1-Day Acuvue®和SofLens®one - day disposable在总体满意度上得分更高,但在强制选择比较中,50%的参与者更喜欢Focus®Dailies®。我们发现,参与者的偏好似乎受到其他因素的影响,而不是在眼睛上的表现。诸如包装(易于打开)和晶状体设计等因素对患者的晶状体偏好有很大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Value of Flow-Mediated Vasodilation in Brachial Artery and Fingertip Artery for Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Corneal pannus resolved with silicone hydrogel contact lenses: a case series Patient and practitioner perspectives on PureVision continuous wear lenses Cumulative clinical results and projected incident rates of microbial keratitis with PureVision™ silicone hydrogel lenses “Two steps forward, one step back”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1