Effect of Different Roughages on Milk Protein and Milk Fat Synthesis in Dairy Cows

Sha Shan-shan , Zhang Na , Li Qing-zhang
{"title":"Effect of Different Roughages on Milk Protein and Milk Fat Synthesis in Dairy Cows","authors":"Sha Shan-shan ,&nbsp;Zhang Na ,&nbsp;Li Qing-zhang","doi":"10.1016/S1006-8104(17)30005-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The main purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a corn straw or mixed diet on milk production, milk composition and the expression of genes associated with lactation in mid-lactation Chinese Holstein cows. In this study, 10 healthy Chinese Holstein cows were randomly assigned to two groups and fed with different diets respectively, corn straw (CS) or mixed forage (MF) diet. CS group was fed roughage consisting of 53.8% corn straw only and the forge to concentrate (F : C) ratio [dry matter (DM)] was about 40: 60. MF group was fed roughage consisting of 3.7% Chinese wildrye and 23.4% alfalfa hay, the forge to concentrate (F : C) ratio (DM) was 70: 30. All the cows were fed 8 weeks and body weight, dry matter intake, body condition score, fat, protein, lactose, milk yield, total solid and somatic cell count (SCC) were recorded. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to analyze cow mammary gland samples representing two different diets. The results suggested that different diet types had significant effects on milk yield, lactose, milk fat, milk protein, dry matter intake and somatic cell count in dairy cows, and cows fed MF diet improved milk production and lactation performance clearly (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05). In addition, mRNA expression of genes <em>ACC, mTOR, STAT</em>5<em>, CSN</em>2<em>, PPARγ, FABP</em>3 and <em>PTEN</em> in MF group was extremely significantly higher than that in CS group (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05). mRNA expression of <em>AKT</em>1<em>, FAS, SCD</em> and <em>SREBP</em>1<em>c</em> in MF group was significantly higher than that in CS group (<em>P</em>&lt;0.01). In summary, the milk yield and composition in mixed forage group were significantly improved than those in corn straw group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":58038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Northeast Agricultural UniversityEnglish Edition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1006-8104(17)30005-3","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Northeast Agricultural UniversityEnglish Edition","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1006810417300053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a corn straw or mixed diet on milk production, milk composition and the expression of genes associated with lactation in mid-lactation Chinese Holstein cows. In this study, 10 healthy Chinese Holstein cows were randomly assigned to two groups and fed with different diets respectively, corn straw (CS) or mixed forage (MF) diet. CS group was fed roughage consisting of 53.8% corn straw only and the forge to concentrate (F : C) ratio [dry matter (DM)] was about 40: 60. MF group was fed roughage consisting of 3.7% Chinese wildrye and 23.4% alfalfa hay, the forge to concentrate (F : C) ratio (DM) was 70: 30. All the cows were fed 8 weeks and body weight, dry matter intake, body condition score, fat, protein, lactose, milk yield, total solid and somatic cell count (SCC) were recorded. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to analyze cow mammary gland samples representing two different diets. The results suggested that different diet types had significant effects on milk yield, lactose, milk fat, milk protein, dry matter intake and somatic cell count in dairy cows, and cows fed MF diet improved milk production and lactation performance clearly (P<0.05). In addition, mRNA expression of genes ACC, mTOR, STAT5, CSN2, PPARγ, FABP3 and PTEN in MF group was extremely significantly higher than that in CS group (P<0.05). mRNA expression of AKT1, FAS, SCD and SREBP1c in MF group was significantly higher than that in CS group (P<0.01). In summary, the milk yield and composition in mixed forage group were significantly improved than those in corn straw group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同粗饲料对奶牛乳蛋白和乳脂肪合成的影响
本试验旨在研究玉米秸秆和混合饲粮对泌乳中期中国荷斯坦奶牛产奶量、乳成分和泌乳相关基因表达的影响。试验选用10头健康的中国荷斯坦奶牛,随机分为2组,分别饲喂玉米秸秆(CS)和混合饲料(MF)。CS组饲喂粗料,粗料中玉米秸秆含量仅为53.8%,粗精比[干物质(DM)]约为40:60。MF组饲喂粗饲料,粗饲料由3.7%的中国野生牧草和23.4%的苜蓿干草组成,粗精比(F: C)为70:30。饲喂8周,记录奶牛体重、干物质采食量、体况评分、脂肪、蛋白质、乳糖、产奶量、总固形体和体细胞计数(SCC)。采用实时荧光定量PCR (Quantitative real-time PCR, qRT-PCR)对两种不同日粮的奶牛乳腺样本进行分析。结果表明,不同饲粮类型对奶牛产奶量、乳糖、乳脂、乳蛋白、干物质采食量和体细胞计数均有显著影响,且饲粮MF显著提高奶牛产奶量和泌乳性能(P<0.05)。此外,MF组ACC、mTOR、STAT5、CSN2、PPARγ、FABP3、PTEN基因mRNA表达量极显著高于CS组(P<0.05)。MF组AKT1、FAS、SCD、SREBP1c mRNA表达量显著高于CS组(P<0.01)。综上所述,混合饲料组产奶量和成分显著高于玉米秸秆组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1114
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Plant Based Insecticides in Control of Leaf Defoliators (Podagrica uniformis Jacoby and Nisotra sjostedti Jacoby (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) Chemical Composition and Bioactivity of Lippia adoensis Hochst ex. Walp (Verneneaceae) Leaf Essential Oil Against Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Aloe vera Coating Efficiency on Shelf Life of Eggplants at Differential Storage Temperatures Soil Chemical and Biological Property Associated with Walnut (Juglans sigillata Dode) Leaf Decomposition Effect of Different Roughages on Milk Protein and Milk Fat Synthesis in Dairy Cows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1