Global leaf-trait mapping based on optimality theory

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Global Ecology and Biogeography Pub Date : 2023-04-14 DOI:10.1111/geb.13680
Ning Dong, Benjamin Dechant, Han Wang, Ian J. Wright, Iain Colin Prentice
{"title":"Global leaf-trait mapping based on optimality theory","authors":"Ning Dong,&nbsp;Benjamin Dechant,&nbsp;Han Wang,&nbsp;Ian J. Wright,&nbsp;Iain Colin Prentice","doi":"10.1111/geb.13680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Leaf traits are central to plant function, and key variables in ecosystem models. However recently published global trait maps, made by applying statistical or machine-learning techniques to large compilations of trait and environmental data, differ substantially from one another. This paper aims to demonstrate the potential of an alternative approach, based on eco-evolutionary optimality theory, to yield predictions of spatio-temporal patterns in leaf traits that can be independently evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Innovation</h3>\n \n <p>Global patterns of community-mean specific leaf area (SLA) and photosynthetic capacity (<i>V</i><sub>cmax</sub>) are predicted from climate via existing optimality models. Then leaf nitrogen per unit area (<i>N</i><sub>area</sub>) and mass (<i>N</i><sub>mass</sub>) are inferred using their (previously derived) empirical relationships to SLA and <i>V</i><sub>cmax</sub>. Trait data are thus reserved for testing model predictions across sites. Temporal trends can also be predicted, as consequences of environmental change, and compared to those inferred from leaf-level measurements and/or remote-sensing methods, which are an increasingly important source of information on spatio-temporal variation in plant traits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Model predictions evaluated against site-mean trait data from &gt; 2,000 sites in the Plant Trait database yielded <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 73% for SLA, 38% for <i>N</i><sub>mass</sub> and 28% for <i>N</i><sub>area</sub>. Declining species-level <i>N</i><sub>mass</sub>, and increasing community-level SLA, have both been recently reported and were both correctly predicted. Leaf-trait mapping via optimality theory holds promise for macroecological applications, including an improved understanding of community leaf-trait responses to environmental change.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"32 7","pages":"1152-1162"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13680","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13680","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Leaf traits are central to plant function, and key variables in ecosystem models. However recently published global trait maps, made by applying statistical or machine-learning techniques to large compilations of trait and environmental data, differ substantially from one another. This paper aims to demonstrate the potential of an alternative approach, based on eco-evolutionary optimality theory, to yield predictions of spatio-temporal patterns in leaf traits that can be independently evaluated.

Innovation

Global patterns of community-mean specific leaf area (SLA) and photosynthetic capacity (Vcmax) are predicted from climate via existing optimality models. Then leaf nitrogen per unit area (Narea) and mass (Nmass) are inferred using their (previously derived) empirical relationships to SLA and Vcmax. Trait data are thus reserved for testing model predictions across sites. Temporal trends can also be predicted, as consequences of environmental change, and compared to those inferred from leaf-level measurements and/or remote-sensing methods, which are an increasingly important source of information on spatio-temporal variation in plant traits.

Main conclusions

Model predictions evaluated against site-mean trait data from > 2,000 sites in the Plant Trait database yielded R2 = 73% for SLA, 38% for Nmass and 28% for Narea. Declining species-level Nmass, and increasing community-level SLA, have both been recently reported and were both correctly predicted. Leaf-trait mapping via optimality theory holds promise for macroecological applications, including an improved understanding of community leaf-trait responses to environmental change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于最优性理论的全局叶性状映射
目的叶片性状是植物功能的核心,也是生态系统模型的关键变量。然而,最近发表的全球特征图(通过将统计或机器学习技术应用于特征和环境数据的大型汇编而制成)彼此之间存在很大差异。本文旨在展示一种基于生态进化最优性理论的替代方法的潜力,以产生可独立评估的叶片性状时空模式的预测。利用现有的优化模型,从气候角度预测了群落平均比叶面积(SLA)和光合能力(Vcmax)的全球格局。然后,利用叶片单位面积氮(Narea)和质量氮(Nmass)与SLA和Vcmax的经验关系(先前导出的)推断叶片单位面积氮(Narea)和质量氮(Nmass)。因此,性状数据保留用于跨站点测试模型预测。作为环境变化的结果,还可以预测时间趋势,并与叶片水平测量和/或遥感方法推断的时间趋势进行比较,叶片水平测量和/或遥感方法是关于植物性状时空变化的日益重要的信息来源。根据Plant trait数据库中2000个位点的平均性状数据评估的模型预测结果显示,SLA的R2 = 73%, Nmass的R2 = 38%, Narea的R2 = 28%。物种水平的Nmass下降和群落水平的SLA增加都是最近报道的,并且都是正确预测的。通过最优性理论绘制叶性状图谱有望用于宏观生态应用,包括提高对群落叶性状对环境变化的响应的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Thermal Forcing Versus Chilling? Misspecification of Temperature Controls in Spring Phenology Models Predicting Landscape Conversion Impact on Small Mammal Occurrence and the Transmission of Parasites in the Atlantic Forest Spatial Variation in Upper Limits of Coral Cover on the Great Barrier Reef Ecological but Not Biological Traits of European Riverine Invertebrates Respond Consistently to Anthropogenic Impacts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1