STRICT MORAL LIABILITY

IF 0.3 4区哲学 Q4 ETHICS Social Philosophy & Policy Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1017/S0265052519000220

Justin A. Capes

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract: Strict liability in tort law is thought by some to have a moral counterpart. In this essay I attempt to determine whether there is, in fact, strict liability in the moral domain. I argue that there is, and I critically evaluate several accounts of its normative foundations before suggesting one of my own.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

严格的道德责任

摘要:侵权法中的严格责任被认为具有道德对应物。在这篇文章中，我试图确定在道德领域是否存在严格责任。我认为有，在提出我自己的观点之前，我批判性地评估了几个关于其规范基础的说法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Social Philosophy & Policy Multiple-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Social Philosophy and Policy is an interdisciplinary journal with an emphasis on the philosophical underpinnings of enduring social policy debates. The issues are thematic in format, examining a specific area of concern with contributions from scholars in different disciplines, especially philosophy, economics, political science and law. While not primarily a journal of policy prescriptions, some articles in each issue will typically connect theory with practice. The 2006 issues are "Justice and Global Politics" and "Taxation, Economic Prosperity, and Distributive Justice". The 2007 issues will be "Liberalism: Old and New" and "Ancient Greek Political Theory".

期刊最新文献

A LIMITED DEFENSE OF EFFICIENCY AGAINST CHARGES OF INCOHERENCY AND BIAS WHO SHOULD TAX MULTINATIONALS? PREDISTRIBUTION AGAINST RENT-SEEKING: THE BENEFIT PRINCIPLE’S ALTERNATIVE TO REDISTRIBUTIVE TAXATION REALIZATION AND RECOGNITION UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE JUSTIFYING TAXATION