BEYOND BINARIES: TECHNOCRACY, POPULISM AND PUBLIC POLICY

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS National Institute Economic Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1017/nie.2022.10
Adrian Pabst
{"title":"BEYOND BINARIES: TECHNOCRACY, POPULISM AND PUBLIC POLICY","authors":"Adrian Pabst","doi":"10.1017/nie.2022.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Populism is a paradoxical phenomenon that resists easy categorisation because it both rejects and intensifies certain elements of technocracy. Populist politics is at once a backlash against liberal-technocratic ideology and policy and an attempted corrective of some of its worst excesses, such as increasing inequality or pressures on wages. Despite deep differences, both rest on a binary logic that conceals alternatives to the convergence around variants of techno-populism defended by either ‘corporate populists’ or ‘insurgent populists’. One alternative is a public policy programme focused on the building of an economic democracy with more democratic workplaces and a greater emphasis on the dignity of decent jobs, besides policies to reduce regional disparities and foster shared prosperity. But policies alone cannot fully address the deep-seated grievances fuelling the support for populists. Fundamental institutional reform is needed to devolve power and wealth to people and the places where they live and work.","PeriodicalId":45594,"journal":{"name":"National Institute Economic Review","volume":"259 1","pages":"67 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Institute Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/nie.2022.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Populism is a paradoxical phenomenon that resists easy categorisation because it both rejects and intensifies certain elements of technocracy. Populist politics is at once a backlash against liberal-technocratic ideology and policy and an attempted corrective of some of its worst excesses, such as increasing inequality or pressures on wages. Despite deep differences, both rest on a binary logic that conceals alternatives to the convergence around variants of techno-populism defended by either ‘corporate populists’ or ‘insurgent populists’. One alternative is a public policy programme focused on the building of an economic democracy with more democratic workplaces and a greater emphasis on the dignity of decent jobs, besides policies to reduce regional disparities and foster shared prosperity. But policies alone cannot fully address the deep-seated grievances fuelling the support for populists. Fundamental institutional reform is needed to devolve power and wealth to people and the places where they live and work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越二元:技术官僚、民粹主义和公共政策
抽象的民粹主义是一种矛盾的现象,它拒绝简单的分类,因为它既拒绝又强化了技术官僚的某些元素。民粹主义政治既是对自由技术官僚意识形态和政策的强烈反对,也是对一些最严重的过度行为的纠正,比如不断加剧的不平等或工资压力。尽管存在深刻的差异,但两者都基于一种二元逻辑,这种逻辑隐藏了围绕“企业民粹主义者”或“反叛民粹主义者”捍卫的技术民粹主义变体的融合的替代方案。一种替代方案是制定一项公共政策计划,重点建设经济民主,使工作场所更加民主,更加强调体面工作的尊严,此外还有减少地区差距和促进共享繁荣的政策。但仅靠政策无法完全解决助长民粹主义者支持率的根深蒂固的不满情绪。需要进行根本性的制度改革,将权力和财富下放给人民以及他们生活和工作的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The National Institute Economic Review is the quarterly publication of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, one of Britain"s oldest and most prestigious independent research organisations. The Institutes objective is to promote, through quantitative research, a deeper understanding of the interaction of economic and social forces that affect peoples" lives so that they may be improved. It has no political affiliation, and receives no core funding from government. Its research programme is organised under the headings of Economic Modelling and Analysis; Productivity; Education and Training and the International Economy.
期刊最新文献
Changes and thresholds in the Oxford Shoulder Score following shoulder arthroplasty: Minimal clinically important difference, minimal important and detectable changes, and patient-acceptable symptom state. THE ROLE OF BATTERIES AND FUEL CELLS IN DECARBONISING THE UK ECONOMY CLIMATE-RELATED DISCUSSIONS ON SOCIAL MEDIA: CRITICAL LESSONS FOR POLICYMAKERS GREENER IS CHEAPER: AN EXAMPLE FROM OFFSHORE WIND FARMS POLICIES FOR INCLUSIVE GROWTH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1