Asymmetry in elastic properties and the evolution of large continental strike-slip faults

IF 4.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Pub Date : 2005-03-19 DOI:10.1029/2004JB003343
Xavier Le Pichon, Corné Kreemer, Nicolas Chamot-Rooke
{"title":"Asymmetry in elastic properties and the evolution of large continental strike-slip faults","authors":"Xavier Le Pichon,&nbsp;Corné Kreemer,&nbsp;Nicolas Chamot-Rooke","doi":"10.1029/2004JB003343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><span>[1] </span>We use geodetic studies to quantify several cases of significant asymmetry in interseismic and coseismic effects along large continental strike-slip faults using simple two-dimensional edge dislocation models. We first show that asymmetric elastic loading characterizes the present Main Marmara Fault, a portion of the North Anatolian Fault along the northern margin of the Sea of Marmara. The ratio of asymmetry there is about 10. This ratio is even larger, about 30, along the northern Sumatra fault near lake Toba caldera. We then examine two profiles near Point Reyes and Point Arena across the northern San Andreas Fault that have been previously proposed as affected by asymmetry both in interseismic and coseismic effects. We show that an asymmetry ratio of 1.6 in interseismic loading exists near Point Arena, with the southwest side of the fault being more rigid than the northeast one. On the other hand, we do not find significant asymmetry for the Point Reyes profile that was previously described as highly asymmetric. We examine coseismic motion during the 1906 earthquake along the same two profiles. Ratios of 1.2 and 1.7 are found for the Point Arena and Point Reyes profiles, respectively. We discuss the possible causes of asymmetry. Contrasts in seismic velocity in the brittle portion suggest ratios generally not exceeding 2.5 for the dynamic rigidity in the upper brittle section. Larger ratios may involve other complex causes such as differences between static and dynamic rigidities, contrasts in rheology in the deeper creeping sections, and postseismic transients. We conclude that asymmetry should be systematically included within the parameters to be inverted when dealing with the mechanics of large-scale strike-slip faults.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"110 B3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1029/2004JB003343","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2004JB003343","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

[1] We use geodetic studies to quantify several cases of significant asymmetry in interseismic and coseismic effects along large continental strike-slip faults using simple two-dimensional edge dislocation models. We first show that asymmetric elastic loading characterizes the present Main Marmara Fault, a portion of the North Anatolian Fault along the northern margin of the Sea of Marmara. The ratio of asymmetry there is about 10. This ratio is even larger, about 30, along the northern Sumatra fault near lake Toba caldera. We then examine two profiles near Point Reyes and Point Arena across the northern San Andreas Fault that have been previously proposed as affected by asymmetry both in interseismic and coseismic effects. We show that an asymmetry ratio of 1.6 in interseismic loading exists near Point Arena, with the southwest side of the fault being more rigid than the northeast one. On the other hand, we do not find significant asymmetry for the Point Reyes profile that was previously described as highly asymmetric. We examine coseismic motion during the 1906 earthquake along the same two profiles. Ratios of 1.2 and 1.7 are found for the Point Arena and Point Reyes profiles, respectively. We discuss the possible causes of asymmetry. Contrasts in seismic velocity in the brittle portion suggest ratios generally not exceeding 2.5 for the dynamic rigidity in the upper brittle section. Larger ratios may involve other complex causes such as differences between static and dynamic rigidities, contrasts in rheology in the deeper creeping sections, and postseismic transients. We conclude that asymmetry should be systematically included within the parameters to be inverted when dealing with the mechanics of large-scale strike-slip faults.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弹性性质的不对称性与大型大陆走滑断层的演化
[1]我们利用大地测量学研究,利用简单的二维边缘位错模型,量化了沿大型大陆走滑断层的地震间和同震效应的几个显著不对称性案例。本文首先表明,马尔马拉主断层是马尔马拉海北缘北安那托利亚断层的一部分,具有非对称弹性载荷特征。不对称的比例大约是10。这一比例甚至更大,在靠近多巴湖火山口的北苏门答腊断层上,约为30。然后,我们研究了横跨圣安德烈亚斯断层北部的雷耶斯点和阿雷纳点附近的两条剖面,这些剖面先前被认为是受地震间和同震效应不对称性的影响。结果表明,在阿纳雷点附近,地震间荷载的不对称比为1.6,断层西南侧比东北侧刚性强。另一方面,我们没有发现以前被描述为高度不对称的Point Reyes剖面的显著不对称。我们沿着相同的两条剖面研究1906年地震期间的同震运动。Point Arena和Point Reyes剖面的比值分别为1.2和1.7。我们讨论了不对称的可能原因。脆性部分的地震速度对比表明,上部脆性部分的动刚度比一般不超过2.5。较大的比率可能涉及其他复杂的原因,如静力和动力刚度之间的差异,深层蠕变截面的流变学差异以及地震后瞬变。我们认为,在处理大型走滑断层的力学时,不对称性应系统地包含在待反演的参数中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
559
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology. JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields. JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Deep Seafloor Ambient Seismic Noise Monitoring for Oceanic and Atmospheric Pressure Changes Behavior of Coastal Amagmatic Geothermal Systems: Thermal–Hydraulic Modeling Insights From La Jolla Beach, Baja California, Mexico Influence of the Loading Stiffness on Sheared Granular Fault Gouge, and Applicability to Slip-Weakening Theory Quantifying Gas and Thermal Energy Emissions in an Active Geothermal Area: Insights From Le Biancane (Larderello Field, Italy) Limited Passive Lithospheric Underthrusting and Localized Crustal Thickening Beneath the Qilian Shan, Northeastern Tibetan Plateau: Evidence From Receiver Function Imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1