High to Low pellet cladding gap heat transfer modeling methodology in an uncertainty quantification framework for a PWR Rod Ejection Accident with best estimate coupling

IF 0.9 Q3 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1051/epjn/2020018
G.-K. Delipei, J. Garnier, J. L. Pallec, B. Normand
{"title":"High to Low pellet cladding gap heat transfer modeling methodology in an uncertainty quantification framework for a PWR Rod Ejection Accident with best estimate coupling","authors":"G.-K. Delipei, J. Garnier, J. L. Pallec, B. Normand","doi":"10.1051/epjn/2020018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High to Low modeling approaches can alleviate the computationally expensive fuel modeling in nuclear reactor’s transient uncertainty quantification. This is especially the case for Rod Ejection Accident (REA) in Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR) were strong multi-physics interactions occur. In this work, we develop and propose a pellet cladding gap heat transfer (Hgap) High to Low modeling methodology for a PWR REA in an uncertainty quantification framework. The methodology involves the calibration of a simplified Hgap model based on high fidelity simulations with the fuel-thermomechanics code ALCYONE1. The calibrated model is then introduced into the CEA developed CORPUS Best Estimate (BE) multi-physics coupling between APOLLO3 R © and FLICA4. This creates an Improved Best Estimate (IBE) coupling that is then used for an uncertainty quantification study. The results indicate that with IBE the distance to boiling crisis uncertainty is decreased from 57% to 42%. This is reflected to the decrease of the sensitivity of Hgap. In the BE coupling Hgap was responsible for 50% of the output variance while in IBE it is close to 0. These results show the potential gain of High to Low approaches for Hgap modeling in REA uncertainty analyses.","PeriodicalId":44454,"journal":{"name":"EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies","volume":"6 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2020018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

High to Low modeling approaches can alleviate the computationally expensive fuel modeling in nuclear reactor’s transient uncertainty quantification. This is especially the case for Rod Ejection Accident (REA) in Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR) were strong multi-physics interactions occur. In this work, we develop and propose a pellet cladding gap heat transfer (Hgap) High to Low modeling methodology for a PWR REA in an uncertainty quantification framework. The methodology involves the calibration of a simplified Hgap model based on high fidelity simulations with the fuel-thermomechanics code ALCYONE1. The calibrated model is then introduced into the CEA developed CORPUS Best Estimate (BE) multi-physics coupling between APOLLO3 R © and FLICA4. This creates an Improved Best Estimate (IBE) coupling that is then used for an uncertainty quantification study. The results indicate that with IBE the distance to boiling crisis uncertainty is decreased from 57% to 42%. This is reflected to the decrease of the sensitivity of Hgap. In the BE coupling Hgap was responsible for 50% of the output variance while in IBE it is close to 0. These results show the potential gain of High to Low approaches for Hgap modeling in REA uncertainty analyses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有最佳估计耦合的压水堆堆棒抛射事故的不确定性量化框架中高到低球团包层间隙传热建模方法
从高到低的建模方法可以减轻核反应堆暂态不确定性量化中燃料建模的计算成本。压水堆堆棒抛射事故是一种强多物理场相互作用的事故。在这项工作中,我们开发并提出了一种在不确定性量化框架下的压水堆REA的颗粒包层间隙传热(Hgap)高到低建模方法。该方法包括使用燃料热力学代码ALCYONE1对基于高保真度模拟的简化Hgap模型进行校准。然后将校正后的模型引入CEA开发的APOLLO3 R©与FLICA4之间的CORPUS Best Estimate (BE)多物理场耦合。这创建了一个改进的最佳估计(IBE)耦合,然后用于不确定性量化研究。结果表明,使用IBE后,沸点危机不确定性距离从57%降低到42%。这反映在Hgap的灵敏度降低上。在BE耦合中,Hgap负责50%的输出方差,而在IBE中,它接近于0。这些结果显示了在REA不确定性分析中Hgap建模的从高到低方法的潜在增益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies
EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Technical note: stable and unstable reactors Templates of expected measurement uncertainties for neutron-induced capture and charged-particle production cross section observables Templates of expected measurement uncertainties for (n, xn) cross sections Templates of expected measurement uncertainties for total neutron cross-section observables Templates of expected measurement uncertainties for prompt fission neutron spectra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1