Introduction − Aspects of the grammatization of the chinese language

Q2 Arts and Humanities Histoire Epistemologie Langage Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1051/HEL/2019010
Tommaso Pellin
{"title":"Introduction − Aspects of the grammatization of the chinese language","authors":"Tommaso Pellin","doi":"10.1051/HEL/2019010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author of the passage hereabove is Joshua Marshman (1768–1837), an English Protestant missionary to India who in 1814 published Clavis Sinica, a work on the Chinese language, including a presentation of the elements of Chinese grammar. Marshman was, undoubtedly, a pioneer of the study of Chinese grammar: his Clavis Sinica was one of the earliest grammars of Chinese and his research provided a very deep insight into the matter. Therefore, he is usually included among the scholars who contributed most to the development of studies of Chinese grammar. Yet from his words it can be assumed that he had no knowledge of native Chinese grammar studies and therefore, as far as this linguistic branch was concerned, he flatly dismissed Chinese traditional linguistic research: grammar studies, as Marshman puts it, simply do not exist in China. While in 17th and 18th century essays on the Chinese language, written by European missionaries, Chinese was described as radically diverse, diametrically opposed, and the nature of grammatical studies in traditional China was not a matter of debate, the cliché of the absence of grammar studies in China began to","PeriodicalId":35179,"journal":{"name":"Histoire Epistemologie Langage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histoire Epistemologie Langage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/HEL/2019010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The author of the passage hereabove is Joshua Marshman (1768–1837), an English Protestant missionary to India who in 1814 published Clavis Sinica, a work on the Chinese language, including a presentation of the elements of Chinese grammar. Marshman was, undoubtedly, a pioneer of the study of Chinese grammar: his Clavis Sinica was one of the earliest grammars of Chinese and his research provided a very deep insight into the matter. Therefore, he is usually included among the scholars who contributed most to the development of studies of Chinese grammar. Yet from his words it can be assumed that he had no knowledge of native Chinese grammar studies and therefore, as far as this linguistic branch was concerned, he flatly dismissed Chinese traditional linguistic research: grammar studies, as Marshman puts it, simply do not exist in China. While in 17th and 18th century essays on the Chinese language, written by European missionaries, Chinese was described as radically diverse, diametrically opposed, and the nature of grammatical studies in traditional China was not a matter of debate, the cliché of the absence of grammar studies in China began to
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
−汉语语法化方面
这段话的作者是Joshua Marshman(1768-1837),他是一位前往印度的英国新教传教士,他在1814年出版了《中国文论》(Clavis Sinica),这是一本关于汉语的著作,其中包括汉语语法元素的介绍。毫无疑问,马什曼是研究汉语语法的先驱:他的《中央克拉维斯》是最早的汉语语法之一,他的研究对这一问题提供了非常深刻的见解。因此,他通常被列入对汉语语法研究发展贡献最大的学者之列。然而,从他的话中可以看出,他对中国本土的语法研究一无所知,因此,就这一语言学分支而言,他断然驳斥了中国传统的语言学研究:正如马什曼所说,语法研究在中国根本不存在。虽然在17、18世纪欧洲传教士写的关于汉语的文章中,汉语被描述为极其多样、截然相反的,而且传统中国的语法研究的性质也不是一个争论的问题,但中国缺乏语法研究的陈词滥调开始引起人们的争论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Histoire Epistemologie Langage
Histoire Epistemologie Langage Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Les derniers travaux de Trần Đức Thảo sur l’origine du langage et de la conscience (1975-1991). Les Recherches anthropologiques Trần Đức Thảo et la sémiotique marxiste de Vološinov et Rossi-Landi. Travail linguistique, hominisation et pratique sociale De quelques intersections entre la philosophie linguistique de Trần Đức Thảo et la phénoménologie sémiotique La construction mutuelle du sujet et du monde. La méthode génétique et l’hypothèse de la récapitulation chez Piaget et Trần Đức Thảo Transitivité et intransitivité dans la grammaire de Bar Hebræus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1