Far lower volumes of local anesthetic: What for?

Josep Lluis Aguilar Sánchez MD, PhD, DESA, MBA , Javier Carbayo Lázaro MD , Paula Delgado García MD , Carlos Castro Arranz MD , Ma Vega Reyes García MD , Silvia López Márquez MD, DESA
{"title":"Far lower volumes of local anesthetic: What for?","authors":"Josep Lluis Aguilar Sánchez MD, PhD, DESA, MBA ,&nbsp;Javier Carbayo Lázaro MD ,&nbsp;Paula Delgado García MD ,&nbsp;Carlos Castro Arranz MD ,&nbsp;Ma Vega Reyes García MD ,&nbsp;Silvia López Márquez MD, DESA","doi":"10.1053/j.trap.2013.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>One of the advantages attributed to the use of ultrasounds in regional anesthesia is the possibility of applying low volumes of </span>local anesthetic. Some studies report the efficient use of extremely low volumes in certain types of blocks. Those results are not easy to extrapolate to general practice because of, among other reasons, the big differences in technical skills among professionals (which are crucial to the ability to reduce the volume used). However, the term “intraneural injection” is currently being redefined based on histology, </span>anatomy, physiology, and on clinical and experimental results. The possibility and advisability of using intraneural-extrafascicular injections to obtain efficient and safe blocks with minimum volumes is now widely studied and debated, as well as the idea that it could be safe in certain selected locations (mainly at the popliteal sciatic level). The purpose of this article is to present the current status of this topic and to share our opinion and elicit debate on the true repercussions and usefulness of a hypothetical reduction of the local anesthetic volumes to their minimum, based on both the reports published and our own clinical experience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93817,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in regional anesthesia & pain management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.trap.2013.03.006","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in regional anesthesia & pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084208X13000190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the advantages attributed to the use of ultrasounds in regional anesthesia is the possibility of applying low volumes of local anesthetic. Some studies report the efficient use of extremely low volumes in certain types of blocks. Those results are not easy to extrapolate to general practice because of, among other reasons, the big differences in technical skills among professionals (which are crucial to the ability to reduce the volume used). However, the term “intraneural injection” is currently being redefined based on histology, anatomy, physiology, and on clinical and experimental results. The possibility and advisability of using intraneural-extrafascicular injections to obtain efficient and safe blocks with minimum volumes is now widely studied and debated, as well as the idea that it could be safe in certain selected locations (mainly at the popliteal sciatic level). The purpose of this article is to present the current status of this topic and to share our opinion and elicit debate on the true repercussions and usefulness of a hypothetical reduction of the local anesthetic volumes to their minimum, based on both the reports published and our own clinical experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低得多的局部麻醉剂:为什么?
在局部麻醉中使用超声的优点之一是可以应用小剂量的局部麻醉。一些研究报告了在某些类型的块中极低体积的有效利用。这些结果不容易推断到一般实践中,原因之一是专业人员的技术技能存在巨大差异(这对减少使用量的能力至关重要)。然而,“神经内注射”一词目前正在根据组织学、解剖学、生理学以及临床和实验结果重新定义。目前广泛研究和讨论了使用神经内-筋膜外注射以最小体积获得有效和安全阻滞的可能性和可行性,以及在某些选定位置(主要是在腘窝坐骨水平)可能是安全的。本文的目的是介绍这一主题的现状,并根据已发表的报告和我们自己的临床经验,分享我们的观点,并引发关于假设将局麻药量减少到最小的真正影响和有用性的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction Radiofrequency strategies to target peripheral large joint orthopedic pain Radiofrequency ablation of splanchnic nerves for control of chronic abdominal pain Technical aspects of conventional and water-cooled monopolar lumbar radiofrequency rhizotomy Cervical spine pain related to the facet joints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1