Deciphering the “obesity paradox” in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sarcopenic obesity

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2022-11-28 DOI:10.1111/obr.13534
Chaoran Liu, Pui Yan Wong, Yik Lok Chung, Simon Kwoon-Ho Chow, Wing Hoi Cheung, Sheung Wai Law, Juliana Chung Ngor Chan, Ronald Man Yeung Wong
{"title":"Deciphering the “obesity paradox” in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sarcopenic obesity","authors":"Chaoran Liu,&nbsp;Pui Yan Wong,&nbsp;Yik Lok Chung,&nbsp;Simon Kwoon-Ho Chow,&nbsp;Wing Hoi Cheung,&nbsp;Sheung Wai Law,&nbsp;Juliana Chung Ngor Chan,&nbsp;Ronald Man Yeung Wong","doi":"10.1111/obr.13534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Aging and obesity are two global concerns in public health. Sarcopenic obesity (SO), defined as the combination of age-related sarcopenia and obesity, has become a pressing issue. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarize the current clinical evidence relevant to SO. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched, and 106 clinical studies with 167,151 elderlies were included. The estimated prevalence of SO was 9% in both men and women. Obesity was associated with 34% reduced risk of sarcopenia (odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 95% CI 0.48–0.91; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) of all-cause mortality was 1.51 (95% CI 1.14–2.02; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) for people with SO compared with healthy individuals. SO was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and related mortality, metabolic disorders, cognitive impairment, arthritis, functional limitation, and lung diseases (all ORs &gt; 1.0, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The attenuated risk of sarcopenia in elderlies with obesity (“obesity paradox”) was dependent on higher muscle mass and strength. Apart from unifying the diagnosis of SO, more research is needed to subphenotype people with obesity and sarcopenia for individualized treatment. Meanwhile, the maintenance of proper body composition of muscle and fat may delay or attenuate the adverse outcomes of aging.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obr.13534","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Aging and obesity are two global concerns in public health. Sarcopenic obesity (SO), defined as the combination of age-related sarcopenia and obesity, has become a pressing issue. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarize the current clinical evidence relevant to SO. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched, and 106 clinical studies with 167,151 elderlies were included. The estimated prevalence of SO was 9% in both men and women. Obesity was associated with 34% reduced risk of sarcopenia (odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 95% CI 0.48–0.91; p < 0.001). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) of all-cause mortality was 1.51 (95% CI 1.14–2.02; p < 0.001) for people with SO compared with healthy individuals. SO was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and related mortality, metabolic disorders, cognitive impairment, arthritis, functional limitation, and lung diseases (all ORs > 1.0, p < 0.05). The attenuated risk of sarcopenia in elderlies with obesity (“obesity paradox”) was dependent on higher muscle mass and strength. Apart from unifying the diagnosis of SO, more research is needed to subphenotype people with obesity and sarcopenia for individualized treatment. Meanwhile, the maintenance of proper body composition of muscle and fat may delay or attenuate the adverse outcomes of aging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读老年人的“肥胖悖论”:肌肉减少型肥胖的系统回顾和荟萃分析
老龄化和肥胖是全球关注的两个公共卫生问题。肌少性肥胖(SO)被定义为年龄相关性肌少症和肥胖的结合,已成为一个紧迫的问题。本系统综述和荟萃分析总结了目前与SO相关的临床证据。检索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science,纳入106项临床研究,涉及167,151名老年人。在男性和女性中,SO的估计患病率均为9%。肥胖与肌肉减少症风险降低34%相关(优势比[OR] 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.91;p < 0.001)。全因死亡率的合并危险比(HR)为1.51 (95% CI 1.14-2.02;p < 0.001)。SO与心血管疾病及相关死亡率、代谢紊乱、认知障碍、关节炎、功能限制和肺部疾病的风险增加相关(所有or值均为1.0,p < 0.05)。老年肥胖患者肌肉减少症风险的降低(“肥胖悖论”)依赖于较高的肌肉质量和力量。除了统一SO的诊断外,还需要更多的研究来对肥胖和肌肉减少症患者进行亚表型分析,以便进行个体化治疗。同时,保持适当的身体肌肉和脂肪组成可以延缓或减轻衰老的不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
期刊最新文献
Trends in adherence to physical activity guidelines from 1997 to 2018 among adults with obesity: An analysis from the US National Health Interview Survey. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic bariatric surgery in patients of 70 years and older: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Valuing behavioral interventions for obesity reduction: A scoping review of economic models. Treating metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: The fat-trimming FGF21 approach. Recommender systems use in weight management mHealth interventions: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1