Impact of Modality on Workload among Engineering Undergraduates during the COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 1.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Civil Engineering Education Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1061/jceecd.eieng-1879
M. Watson, E. Barrella, K. Skenes
{"title":"Impact of Modality on Workload among Engineering Undergraduates during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"M. Watson, E. Barrella, K. Skenes","doi":"10.1061/jceecd.eieng-1879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented disruptions in models for engineering student training. At The Citadel, an undergraduate-focused college in the Southeastern United States, a variety of modalities were implemented following the onset of the pandemic, including emergency online and Hyflex learning. We conducted a longitudinal study to analyze the cognitive load among our undergraduate engineering students throughout changing modalities. Using data from the NASA Task Load Index (TLX) and open-ended reflections on student challenges, we found that total workload (a surrogate for cognitive load) was generally highest during emergency online learning in the second half of Spring 2020 semester, with experiences possibly varying across different demographic and academic groups. Emergency online challenges were often related to time management, personal organization, and responsibility for learning. In contrast, HyFlex challenges were often related to technology and communication challenges. While emergency online learning was a cognitive load disruption, that disruption was often associated with personal and/or academic development. HyFlex learning mediated cognitive load disruption;although, student challenges may have been simple nuisances rather than mediators of developmental change. © 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.","PeriodicalId":48476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Engineering Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/jceecd.eieng-1879","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented disruptions in models for engineering student training. At The Citadel, an undergraduate-focused college in the Southeastern United States, a variety of modalities were implemented following the onset of the pandemic, including emergency online and Hyflex learning. We conducted a longitudinal study to analyze the cognitive load among our undergraduate engineering students throughout changing modalities. Using data from the NASA Task Load Index (TLX) and open-ended reflections on student challenges, we found that total workload (a surrogate for cognitive load) was generally highest during emergency online learning in the second half of Spring 2020 semester, with experiences possibly varying across different demographic and academic groups. Emergency online challenges were often related to time management, personal organization, and responsibility for learning. In contrast, HyFlex challenges were often related to technology and communication challenges. While emergency online learning was a cognitive load disruption, that disruption was often associated with personal and/or academic development. HyFlex learning mediated cognitive load disruption;although, student challenges may have been simple nuisances rather than mediators of developmental change. © 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎疫情期间方式对工科大学生工作量的影响
2019冠状病毒病大流行对工程专业学生的培训模式造成了前所未有的破坏。在美国东南部的一所以本科生为重点的学院The Citadel,在疫情爆发后实施了多种模式,包括紧急在线学习和Hyflex学习。我们进行了一项纵向研究来分析我们的本科工程专业学生在不同模式下的认知负荷。利用NASA任务负荷指数(TLX)的数据和对学生挑战的开放式反思,我们发现,在2020年春季学期下半学期的紧急在线学习期间,总工作量(认知负荷的替代指标)通常是最高的,不同人口和学术群体的经历可能有所不同。紧急在线挑战通常与时间管理、个人组织和学习责任有关。相比之下,HyFlex的挑战通常与技术和通信挑战有关。虽然紧急在线学习是一种认知负荷中断,但这种中断通常与个人和/或学术发展有关。HyFlex学习介导认知负荷中断;虽然,学生的挑战可能是简单的滋扰,而不是发展变化的中介。©2023美国土木工程师学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Industry Perception of the Knowledge and Skills Required to Implement Sensor Data Analytics in Construction Investigating the Effects of Virtual Site Tours in Construction Technology Education: An ePlatform for Students’ Transferable Knowledge Acquisition Alignment of Civil Engineering Programs with the ASCE Body of Knowledge Assessment of Interactive Holographic Scenes in Learning Applications of Sensing Technologies in Construction Education Implementing Technical Communication Instruction in a Civil Engineering Course: The Value of Knowledge Surveys and Peer Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1