Meta-analysis of the published effects of HGP use on beef palatability in steers as measured by objective and sensory testing

R. Watson
{"title":"Meta-analysis of the published effects of HGP use on beef palatability in steers as measured by objective and sensory testing","authors":"R. Watson","doi":"10.1071/EA07174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence is presented that suggests strongly that hormone growth promotant (HGP) implantation has a negative effect on beef palatability. This is based on a meta-analysis of results reported in refereed papers that have appeared in the meat-science literature. To be included in this analysis, a paper must have reported results for control samples (no HGP) and treatment samples (HGP) for either objective testing (Warner-Bratzler shear-force) or consumer preference (tenderness score). The paper must also have reported estimates and standard errors. Further, we consider only the case of steers, and the M. longissimus dorsi (striploin). While most of these studies yielded non-significant differences, most gave an estimate indicating that the HGP treatment had a negative effect on beef palatability. When these results are combined using a meta-analysis, they provide significant evidence that the use of HGP implants negatively influences palatability.","PeriodicalId":8636,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture","volume":"48 1","pages":"1425-1433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/EA07174","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Evidence is presented that suggests strongly that hormone growth promotant (HGP) implantation has a negative effect on beef palatability. This is based on a meta-analysis of results reported in refereed papers that have appeared in the meat-science literature. To be included in this analysis, a paper must have reported results for control samples (no HGP) and treatment samples (HGP) for either objective testing (Warner-Bratzler shear-force) or consumer preference (tenderness score). The paper must also have reported estimates and standard errors. Further, we consider only the case of steers, and the M. longissimus dorsi (striploin). While most of these studies yielded non-significant differences, most gave an estimate indicating that the HGP treatment had a negative effect on beef palatability. When these results are combined using a meta-analysis, they provide significant evidence that the use of HGP implants negatively influences palatability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过客观和感官测试测量的已发表的HGP使用对牛肉适口性的影响的meta分析
有证据表明,激素生长促进剂(HGP)的植入对牛肉的适口性有负面影响。这是基于在肉类科学文献中发表的论文中报告的结果的荟萃分析。要纳入本分析,论文必须报告客观测试(Warner-Bratzler剪切力)或消费者偏好(压痛评分)的对照样本(无HGP)和处理样本(HGP)的结果。论文还必须报告估计和标准误差。此外,我们只考虑牛和背最长肌(striploin)的情况。虽然这些研究大多没有产生显著差异,但大多数都给出了一个估计,表明HGP处理对牛肉的适口性有负面影响。当这些结果结合使用荟萃分析时,它们提供了重要的证据,证明使用HGP植入物会对适口性产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differences in health characteristics and health behaviors between rural and non-rural community-dwelling stroke survivors aged ≥65 years in the USA. Social Determinants of Adherence to COVID-19 Preventive Guidelines in Iran: A Qualitative Study. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in maxillary central incisor with a horizontal mid root fracture after various management protocols. Spontaneous Resolution and Super-coiling in Xerogels of the Products of Photo-Induced Formose Reaction. Dose optimization for assessment of periodontal structures in cone beam CT examinations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1