Social Determinants of Adherence to COVID-19 Preventive Guidelines in Iran: A Qualitative Study.

Sina Ahmadi, Zahra Jorjoran Shushtari, Marzieh Shirazikhah, Akbar Biglarian, Seyed Fahim Irandoost, Toktam Paykani, Ali Almasi, Nader Rajabi-Gilan, Nafiul Mehedi, Yahya Salimi
{"title":"Social Determinants of Adherence to COVID-19 Preventive Guidelines in Iran: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Sina Ahmadi, Zahra Jorjoran Shushtari, Marzieh Shirazikhah, Akbar Biglarian, Seyed Fahim Irandoost, Toktam Paykani, Ali Almasi, Nader Rajabi-Gilan, Nafiul Mehedi, Yahya Salimi","doi":"10.1177/00469580221084185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adherence to COVID-19 preventative guidelines may be influenced by a variety of factors at the individual, societal, and institutional levels. The current study sought to investigate the social factors of adherence to those preventive measures from the perspective of health professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In October 2020, we performed qualitative research in Tehran, Iran, using the directed content analysis method. For the preparation of our interview guide and data analysis, we employed the WHO conceptual framework of socioeconomic determinants of health. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 health professionals and policymakers who were chosen using a purposive sampling approach. MAXQDA-18 software was used to analyze the data. The Goba and Lincoln criteria were used to assess the quality of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There are 23 subcategories and 9 categories, which include socio-economic and political context (unstable macroeconomic environment, poor management of the pandemic, media and knowledge transfer), cultural and social values (fatalism, cultural norms, value conflicts, social customs), socio-economic positions (livelihood conditions), social capital (social cohesion, low trust), living conditions (housing conditions), occupational conditions (precarious employment), individual characteristics (demographic characteristics, personality traits, COVID-19 knowledge, and attitude), psycho-social factors (normalization of the disease, social pressure, and stigma), and health system leadership (health system problems, not taking evidence-based decisions, non-comprehensive preventive guidelines, non-operational guidelines, inadequate executive committee) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To limit the new COVID-19 transmission, people must be encouraged to follow COVID-19 prevention instructions. Improving adherence to COVID-19 preventive guidelines necessitates dealing with the complexities of responding to social determinants of those guidelines. Increasing public health literacy and knowledge of COVID-19, informing people about the consequences of social interactions and cultural customs in the spread of COVID-19, strengthening regulatory lockdown laws, improving guarantees for adhering to preventive guidelines, providing easy access to preventive supplies, and strengthening financial support for households with precarious employment are all important.</p>","PeriodicalId":8636,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture","volume":"38 1","pages":"469580221084185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580221084185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adherence to COVID-19 preventative guidelines may be influenced by a variety of factors at the individual, societal, and institutional levels. The current study sought to investigate the social factors of adherence to those preventive measures from the perspective of health professionals.

Methods: In October 2020, we performed qualitative research in Tehran, Iran, using the directed content analysis method. For the preparation of our interview guide and data analysis, we employed the WHO conceptual framework of socioeconomic determinants of health. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 health professionals and policymakers who were chosen using a purposive sampling approach. MAXQDA-18 software was used to analyze the data. The Goba and Lincoln criteria were used to assess the quality of the results.

Results: There are 23 subcategories and 9 categories, which include socio-economic and political context (unstable macroeconomic environment, poor management of the pandemic, media and knowledge transfer), cultural and social values (fatalism, cultural norms, value conflicts, social customs), socio-economic positions (livelihood conditions), social capital (social cohesion, low trust), living conditions (housing conditions), occupational conditions (precarious employment), individual characteristics (demographic characteristics, personality traits, COVID-19 knowledge, and attitude), psycho-social factors (normalization of the disease, social pressure, and stigma), and health system leadership (health system problems, not taking evidence-based decisions, non-comprehensive preventive guidelines, non-operational guidelines, inadequate executive committee) were obtained.

Conclusion: To limit the new COVID-19 transmission, people must be encouraged to follow COVID-19 prevention instructions. Improving adherence to COVID-19 preventive guidelines necessitates dealing with the complexities of responding to social determinants of those guidelines. Increasing public health literacy and knowledge of COVID-19, informing people about the consequences of social interactions and cultural customs in the spread of COVID-19, strengthening regulatory lockdown laws, improving guarantees for adhering to preventive guidelines, providing easy access to preventive supplies, and strengthening financial support for households with precarious employment are all important.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗遵守 COVID-19 预防指南的社会决定因素:定性研究。
导言:遵守 COVID-19 预防指南可能受到个人、社会和机构层面各种因素的影响。本研究试图从卫生专业人员的角度调查遵守这些预防措施的社会因素:2020 年 10 月,我们在伊朗德黑兰采用定向内容分析法进行了定性研究。在编写访谈指南和进行数据分析时,我们采用了世界卫生组织关于健康的社会经济决定因素的概念框架。我们采用目的性抽样方法,对 15 名卫生专业人员和政策制定者进行了半结构化访谈。我们使用 MAXQDA-18 软件对数据进行了分析。采用戈巴标准和林肯标准评估结果的质量:共有 23 个子类别和 9 个类别,其中包括社会经济和政治背景(宏观经济环境不稳定、对大流行病的管理不善、媒体和知识传播)、文化和社会价值观(宿命论、文化规范、价值冲突、社会习俗)、社会经济地位(生计条件)、社会资本(社会凝聚力、低信任度)、生活条件(住房条件)、职业条件(不稳定就业)、社会资本(社会凝聚力、低信任度)、生活条件(住房条件)、社会资本(社会凝聚力、低信任度)、研究还获得了个人特征(人口统计学特征、个性特征、COVID-19 知识和态度)、社会心理因素(疾病正常化、社会压力和耻辱感)以及卫生系统领导力(卫生系统问题、未采取循证决策、非全面预防指南、非操作指南、执行委员会不健全)。结论为了限制 COVID-19 的新传播,必须鼓励人们遵守 COVID-19 预防指南。要改善 COVID-19 预防指南的遵守情况,就必须处理好应对这些指南的社会决定因素的复杂性。提高公众健康素养和对 COVID-19 的认识,让人们了解社会交往和文化习俗对 COVID-19 传播造成的后果,加强监管锁定法律,改善对遵守预防指南的保障,提供方便的预防用品,加强对就业不稳定家庭的经济支持,这些都非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differences in health characteristics and health behaviors between rural and non-rural community-dwelling stroke survivors aged ≥65 years in the USA. Social Determinants of Adherence to COVID-19 Preventive Guidelines in Iran: A Qualitative Study. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in maxillary central incisor with a horizontal mid root fracture after various management protocols. Spontaneous Resolution and Super-coiling in Xerogels of the Products of Photo-Induced Formose Reaction. Dose optimization for assessment of periodontal structures in cone beam CT examinations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1