The effect of finishing diet and meat cuts on the attributes of four processed products from bull beef

M. Farouk, C. Podmore, C. Boom, G. Sheath
{"title":"The effect of finishing diet and meat cuts on the attributes of four processed products from bull beef","authors":"M. Farouk, C. Podmore, C. Boom, G. Sheath","doi":"10.1071/EA07395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breakfast beef, stir-fry, pot-roast and oven-roast meats were prepared from the brisket, clod, inside round and knuckle of bulls on two pasture-based finishing diets (6 weeks of grain supplement before slaughter or no supplement). Diet affected the fatness of the raw meat but had no significant effect on the attributes assessed by the in-house consumer or trained panel. Stir fry from brisket, and pot roast and oven roast from brisket and clod, had higher (P knuckle > inside round > brisket; and that of product acceptability with appropriate processing was breakfast beef > oven roast > pot roast > stir fry. Female in-house consumer panellists assigned lower acceptability scores to the beef products than their male counterparts (P < 0.05). Because none of the muscles or products made from the muscles were totally rejected by the consumer panel (overall scores range from 4.2 to 7.0), there is potential to add value to these cuts through further processing.","PeriodicalId":8636,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/EA07395","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breakfast beef, stir-fry, pot-roast and oven-roast meats were prepared from the brisket, clod, inside round and knuckle of bulls on two pasture-based finishing diets (6 weeks of grain supplement before slaughter or no supplement). Diet affected the fatness of the raw meat but had no significant effect on the attributes assessed by the in-house consumer or trained panel. Stir fry from brisket, and pot roast and oven roast from brisket and clod, had higher (P knuckle > inside round > brisket; and that of product acceptability with appropriate processing was breakfast beef > oven roast > pot roast > stir fry. Female in-house consumer panellists assigned lower acceptability scores to the beef products than their male counterparts (P < 0.05). Because none of the muscles or products made from the muscles were totally rejected by the consumer panel (overall scores range from 4.2 to 7.0), there is potential to add value to these cuts through further processing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肥育日粮和切肉对4种牛肉制品性状的影响
早餐牛肉、炒牛肉、炖牛肉和烤箱烤肉分别来自牛的胸肉、肉、牛的内脏和牛的指关节,采用两种基于牧场的育肥日粮(屠宰前补充6周谷物或不补充谷物)。饮食会影响生肉的脂肪度,但对内部消费者或培训小组评估的属性没有显著影响。从牛腩炒,锅烤和烤箱烤从牛腩和泥,有更高的(P指关节>内圆>牛腩;加工工艺适宜的产品可接受度为早餐牛肉>烤箱烤>锅烤>炒。女性内部消费者小组成员对牛肉产品的可接受性评分低于男性小组成员(P < 0.05)。因为没有肌肉或由肌肉制成的产品被消费者小组完全拒绝(总分从4.2到7.0不等),因此有可能通过进一步加工来增加这些切割的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ecology of diamondback moth in Australian canola: landscape perspectives and the implications for management Management of beneficial invertebrates and their potential role in integrated pest management for Australian grain systems Insecticide resistance and implications for future aphid management in Australian grains and pastures: a review Strategies for control of the redlegged earth mite in Australia The population dynamics of the mediterranean snails Cernuella virgata, Cochlicella acuta (Hygromiidae) and Theba pisana (Helicidae) in pasture–cereal rotations in South Australia: a 20-year study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1