{"title":"Hand grip strength-based cachexia index as a predictor of cancer cachexia and prognosis in patients with cancer","authors":"Hailun Xie, Guotian Ruan, Lishuang Wei, Heyang Zhang, Yizhong Ge, Qi Zhang, Shiqi Lin, Mengmeng Song, Xi Zhang, Xiaoyue Liu, Xiangrui Li, Kangping Zhang, Ming Yang, Meng Tang, Chun-Hua Song, Jialiang Gan, Han-Ping Shi","doi":"10.1002/jcsm.13139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The cachexia index is a useful predictor for cancer cachexia and prognostic assessment. However, its use is limited because of high testing costs and complicated testing procedures. Thus, in this study, we aimed to develop a hand grip strength (HGS)-based cancer cachexia index (H-CXI) as a potential predictor of cancer cachexia and prognosis in patients with cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Here, 14 682 patients with cancer were studied, including the discovery (6592), internal validation (2820) and external validation (5270) cohorts. The H-CXI was calculated as [HGS (kg)/height (m)<sup>2</sup> × serum albumin (g/L)]/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to create survival curves, and the log-rank test was used to compare time–event relationships between groups. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to determine independent risk factors for overall survival (OS). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association of the H-CXI with short-term outcomes and cancer cachexia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was a significant non-linear relationship between the H-CXI and OS in all cohorts. Patients with a low H-CXI had significantly lower OS than those with a high H-CXI in the discovery cohort (6-year survival percentage: 55.72% vs. 76.70%, log-rank <i>P</i> < 0.001), internal validation cohort (6-year survival percentage: 55.81% vs. 76.70%, log-rank <i>P</i> < 0.001), external validation cohort (6-year survival percentage: 56.05% vs. 75.48%, log-rank <i>P</i> < 0.001) and total cohort (6-year survival percentage: 55.86% vs. 76.27%, log-rank <i>P</i> < 0.001). Notably, the prognostic stratification effect of the H-CXI in patients with advanced-stage disease was more significant than that in patients with early-stage disease. The multivariate Cox proportional risk regression model confirmed that a low H-CXI negatively affected the prognosis of patients with cancer in the discovery cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–0.80, <i>P</i> < 0.001], internal validation cohort (HR 0.79, 95 %CI 0.72–0.86, <i>P</i> < 0.001), external validation cohort (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79–0.89, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and total cohort (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.77–0.83, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression models showed that a low H-CXI was an independent risk factor predicting adverse short-term outcomes and cancer cachexia in patients with cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The simple and practical H-CXI is a promising predictor for cancer cachexia and prognosis in patients with cancer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle","volume":"14 1","pages":"382-390"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcsm.13139","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13139","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Background
The cachexia index is a useful predictor for cancer cachexia and prognostic assessment. However, its use is limited because of high testing costs and complicated testing procedures. Thus, in this study, we aimed to develop a hand grip strength (HGS)-based cancer cachexia index (H-CXI) as a potential predictor of cancer cachexia and prognosis in patients with cancer.
Methods
Here, 14 682 patients with cancer were studied, including the discovery (6592), internal validation (2820) and external validation (5270) cohorts. The H-CXI was calculated as [HGS (kg)/height (m)2 × serum albumin (g/L)]/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to create survival curves, and the log-rank test was used to compare time–event relationships between groups. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to determine independent risk factors for overall survival (OS). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association of the H-CXI with short-term outcomes and cancer cachexia.
Results
There was a significant non-linear relationship between the H-CXI and OS in all cohorts. Patients with a low H-CXI had significantly lower OS than those with a high H-CXI in the discovery cohort (6-year survival percentage: 55.72% vs. 76.70%, log-rank P < 0.001), internal validation cohort (6-year survival percentage: 55.81% vs. 76.70%, log-rank P < 0.001), external validation cohort (6-year survival percentage: 56.05% vs. 75.48%, log-rank P < 0.001) and total cohort (6-year survival percentage: 55.86% vs. 76.27%, log-rank P < 0.001). Notably, the prognostic stratification effect of the H-CXI in patients with advanced-stage disease was more significant than that in patients with early-stage disease. The multivariate Cox proportional risk regression model confirmed that a low H-CXI negatively affected the prognosis of patients with cancer in the discovery cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–0.80, P < 0.001], internal validation cohort (HR 0.79, 95 %CI 0.72–0.86, P < 0.001), external validation cohort (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79–0.89, P < 0.001) and total cohort (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.77–0.83, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression models showed that a low H-CXI was an independent risk factor predicting adverse short-term outcomes and cancer cachexia in patients with cancer.
Conclusions
The simple and practical H-CXI is a promising predictor for cancer cachexia and prognosis in patients with cancer.
背景恶病质指数是癌症恶病质和预后评估的有效预测指标。然而,由于测试成本高,测试程序复杂,其使用受到限制。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在建立一个基于握力(HGS)的癌症恶病质指数(H-CXI)作为癌症患者癌症恶病质和预后的潜在预测因子。方法共纳入14 682例肿瘤患者,包括发现队列(6592例)、内部验证队列(2820例)和外部验证队列(5270例)。计算H-CXI为[HGS (kg)/身高(m)2 ×血清白蛋白(g/L)]/中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,采用log-rank检验比较组间时间-事件关系。采用Cox比例风险回归模型确定总生存期(OS)的独立危险因素。采用Logistic回归分析评估H-CXI与短期预后和癌症恶病质的关系。结果在所有队列中,H-CXI与OS之间存在显著的非线性关系。在发现队列中,低H-CXI患者的OS显著低于高H-CXI患者(6年生存率:55.72% vs 76.70%, log-rank P <0.001),内部验证队列(6年生存率:55.81% vs. 76.70%, log-rank P <0.001),外部验证队列(6年生存率:56.05% vs. 75.48%, log-rank P <0.001)和总队列(6年生存率:55.86% vs. 76.27%, log-rank P <0.001)。值得注意的是,H-CXI在晚期疾病患者中的预后分层作用比在早期疾病患者中更显著。多因素Cox比例风险回归模型证实,低H-CXI对发现队列中癌症患者的预后有负面影响[风险比(HR) 0.75, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.71 ~ 0.80, P <0.001],内部验证队列(HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.72-0.86, P <0.001),外部验证队列(HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.89, P <0.001)和整个队列(HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.77-0.83, P <0.001)。多因素logistic回归模型显示,低H-CXI是预测癌症患者短期不良结局和恶病质的独立危险因素。结论简单实用的H-CXI是预测癌症患者恶病质和预后的良好指标。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia, and Muscle is a prestigious, peer-reviewed international publication committed to disseminating research and clinical insights pertaining to cachexia, sarcopenia, body composition, and the physiological and pathophysiological alterations occurring throughout the lifespan and in various illnesses across the spectrum of life sciences. This journal serves as a valuable resource for physicians, biochemists, biologists, dieticians, pharmacologists, and students alike.