Evaluating drape shape in woven fabrics

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES Journal of the Textile Institute Pub Date : 2017-03-04 DOI:10.1080/00405000.2016.1166804
E. Carrera-Gallissà, X. Capdevila, J. Valldeperas
{"title":"Evaluating drape shape in woven fabrics","authors":"E. Carrera-Gallissà, X. Capdevila, J. Valldeperas","doi":"10.1080/00405000.2016.1166804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A search of the scientific literature for the period 1950–2013 retrieved 36 different drape indicators. Despite the large number of indicators currently available, the drape ratio (%DR) continues to be the most widely used, even though it has proved inadequate to explain drape shape. In order to assess their actual performance, the 36 currently existing drape indicators were determined in a total of 37 commercial drapery, woolmaking, shirtmaking and lining woven fabrics spanning a wide range of composition, aerial weight and weave type using a digital Cusick drape meter. A correlation analysis between indicators, and subsequent suppression of duplicity and collinearity, revealed that seven were mutually correlated. A principal component analysis of the results revealed an underlying structure consisting of three common factors which allowed the indicators to be classified into three different groups according to drape intensity (a), severity (b) and shape symmetry and variability (c). Cluster analysis was additionally used to examine the results in graphical form and exposed three clusters coinciding with the three factors of the underlying structure. A criterion for distinguishing fabrics with an identical drape ratio in terms of drape shape based on sequential application of four of the seven initially selected indicators was developed and experimentally validated.","PeriodicalId":49978,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Textile Institute","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00405000.2016.1166804","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Textile Institute","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2016.1166804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

A search of the scientific literature for the period 1950–2013 retrieved 36 different drape indicators. Despite the large number of indicators currently available, the drape ratio (%DR) continues to be the most widely used, even though it has proved inadequate to explain drape shape. In order to assess their actual performance, the 36 currently existing drape indicators were determined in a total of 37 commercial drapery, woolmaking, shirtmaking and lining woven fabrics spanning a wide range of composition, aerial weight and weave type using a digital Cusick drape meter. A correlation analysis between indicators, and subsequent suppression of duplicity and collinearity, revealed that seven were mutually correlated. A principal component analysis of the results revealed an underlying structure consisting of three common factors which allowed the indicators to be classified into three different groups according to drape intensity (a), severity (b) and shape symmetry and variability (c). Cluster analysis was additionally used to examine the results in graphical form and exposed three clusters coinciding with the three factors of the underlying structure. A criterion for distinguishing fabrics with an identical drape ratio in terms of drape shape based on sequential application of four of the seven initially selected indicators was developed and experimentally validated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机织织物悬垂形状的评定
对1950年至2013年期间的科学文献进行了检索,检索到36种不同的垂度指标。尽管目前有大量的指标可用,悬垂比(%DR)仍然是最广泛使用的,即使它已被证明不足以解释悬垂形状。为了评估这些织物的实际性能,我们使用数字Cusick垂度计,在37种不同成分、航空重量和编织类型的商用垂度织物、羊毛织物、衬衫织物和内衬机织物中,确定了36个现有的垂度指标。一项指标间的相关分析,以及随后对双重性和共线性的抑制,显示出七个指标是相互相关的。结果的主成分分析揭示了一个由三个共同因素组成的底层结构,根据悬垂强度(A)、严重程度(b)和形状对称性和可变性(c),将指标分为三个不同的组。聚类分析还用于以图形形式检查结果,并暴露了与底层结构的三个因素相一致的三个聚类。基于对最初选定的7个指标中的4个指标的顺序应用,开发并实验验证了一种根据悬垂形状区分具有相同悬垂比的织物的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Textile Institute
Journal of the Textile Institute 工程技术-材料科学:纺织
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
149
审稿时长
1.0 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of The Textile Institute welcomes papers concerning research and innovation, reflecting the professional interests of the Textile Institute in science, engineering, economics, management and design related to the textile industry and the use of fibres in consumer and engineering applications. Papers may encompass anything in the range of textile activities, from fibre production through textile processes and machines, to the design, marketing and use of products. Papers may also report fundamental theoretical or experimental investigations, including materials science topics in nanotechnology and smart materials, practical or commercial industrial studies and may relate to technical, economic, aesthetic, social or historical aspects of textiles and the textile industry. All published research articles in The Journal of The Textile Institute have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by two expert referees.
期刊最新文献
Yarn breakage detection in ring spinning through ring temperature drop Analysing barriers of digitalization in apparel sector: a fuzzy DEMATEL approach Current advances on sea-island microfiber nonwoven materials preparation technology and its applications: a review Step-by-step assembly of antimony tin oxide/polymer coatings on cotton fabrics for enhanced electrical conductivity and fire resistance properties New dispersions for pigment printing binders in the manufacture of light industry goods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1