Gender and Developmental Differences in the Academic Study Behaviors of Elementary School Children.

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 1996-07-01 DOI:10.1080/00220973.1996.9943461
T. Hancock, W. Stock, R. W. Kulhavy, L. Swindell
{"title":"Gender and Developmental Differences in the Academic Study Behaviors of Elementary School Children.","authors":"T. Hancock, W. Stock, R. W. Kulhavy, L. Swindell","doi":"10.1080/00220973.1996.9943461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Study behaviors common to elementary school students were identified by teachers, and critical incidents of study behavior were derived from student interviews. A 40-item study behavior questionnaire was developed from the resulting data and administered to 793 elementary students. Factor analysis did not yield a stable structure for the total data set. However, further exploration yielded significant grade (fourth and sixth) and gender factors. The factors indicated that fourth-grade boys and girls emphasize overt study activities, but girls are more occupied with text, their thinking appears to be deeper, and their study behavior more deliberate. In sixth-grade, however, girls' predominant perception of study strategies becomes deliberate, planful review for tests, whereas boys are more concerned with independent study behaviors and deep processing of oral classroom interaction. These gender differences in study strategies appear to account for gender differences in academic achievement identif...","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"65 1","pages":"18-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1996.9943461","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1996.9943461","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Abstract Study behaviors common to elementary school students were identified by teachers, and critical incidents of study behavior were derived from student interviews. A 40-item study behavior questionnaire was developed from the resulting data and administered to 793 elementary students. Factor analysis did not yield a stable structure for the total data set. However, further exploration yielded significant grade (fourth and sixth) and gender factors. The factors indicated that fourth-grade boys and girls emphasize overt study activities, but girls are more occupied with text, their thinking appears to be deeper, and their study behavior more deliberate. In sixth-grade, however, girls' predominant perception of study strategies becomes deliberate, planful review for tests, whereas boys are more concerned with independent study behaviors and deep processing of oral classroom interaction. These gender differences in study strategies appear to account for gender differences in academic achievement identif...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小学生学业学习行为的性别与发展差异。
摘要通过教师对小学生常见的学习行为进行识别,并通过对学生的访谈得出小学生学习行为中的关键事件。本研究以所得资料为基础,编制40项研究行为问卷,并对793名小学生进行问卷调查。因子分析并没有为整个数据集提供一个稳定的结构。然而,进一步的探索发现了显著的年级(第四和第六)和性别因素。这些因素表明,四年级男生和女生都强调显性的学习活动,而女生则更专注于文本,思维更深入,学习行为更刻意。而到了六年级,女生对学习策略的认知主要转变为刻意的、有计划的备考复习,而男生则更关注自主学习行为和课堂口语互动的深度加工。这些学习策略上的性别差异似乎解释了学业成就认同上的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
期刊最新文献
Full-Structured or Supported by Incremental Scaffolds? Effects on Perceived Competence and Motivation Same Classroom, Different Affordances? Demographic Differences in Perceptions of Motivational Climate in Five STEM Courses Newton Makes Me Happy: Cycling Emotions during Science Text Reading Working Memory and Automaticity in Relation to Mental Addition among American Elementary Students Demographic, psychosocial, and medical correlates ofpsychological morbidity after intensive care unit stay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1