A Note on Homogeneity of Variance of Scores and Ranks

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 1996-07-01 DOI:10.1080/00220973.1996.10806603
D. W. Zimmerman
{"title":"A Note on Homogeneity of Variance of Scores and Ranks","authors":"D. W. Zimmerman","doi":"10.1080/00220973.1996.10806603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When any two or more sets of scores with unequal variances are com bined and ranked together as one set, the corresponding sets of ranks inherit the unequal variances. This fact is well known in the theory of nonparametric statistics, but in practice researchers and applied statisticians frequently overlook its implica tions. Because of this property, familiar nonparametric rank tests cannot overcome effects of heterogeneous variances of treatment groups in statistical significance test ing. A simulation study demonstrates explicitly that transformation of scores to ranks reduces variance heterogeneity, although not enough to prevent gross distor tion of the probabilities of type I and type II errors of statistical significance tests, including the t test, the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, and the van der Waerden, or normal scores, test. The present note also focuses attention on an aspect of the prob lem that is neglected in the literature: The equivalence of various nonparametric tests and their parametric counterparts performed on ranks, or the rank transfor mation concept, provides a rationale for the influence of unequal variances on test statistics calculated from ranks. MY PURPOSE in the present note is to call attention to a simple property of ranks that researchers and applied statisticians sometimes overlook when using statistical methods based on ranks. This property, noted by Pratt (1964) and Zaremba (1965), and later by many other authors, has implications for the prob lem of homogeneity of variance in statistical significance testing. It reveals that substitution of nonparametric methods for parametric tests such as t and F to overcome violation of the assumption, a procedure widely recommended in introductory textbooks, does not accomplish what is intended. Although some textbook authors have become aware of this problem in recent years, they have missed its connection with the rank transformation concept, or the equivalence of various nonparametric tests with parametric counterparts per formed on ranks replacing scores. In the present note, I emphasize that this con","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"64 1","pages":"351-362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1996.10806603","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1996.10806603","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

When any two or more sets of scores with unequal variances are com bined and ranked together as one set, the corresponding sets of ranks inherit the unequal variances. This fact is well known in the theory of nonparametric statistics, but in practice researchers and applied statisticians frequently overlook its implica tions. Because of this property, familiar nonparametric rank tests cannot overcome effects of heterogeneous variances of treatment groups in statistical significance test ing. A simulation study demonstrates explicitly that transformation of scores to ranks reduces variance heterogeneity, although not enough to prevent gross distor tion of the probabilities of type I and type II errors of statistical significance tests, including the t test, the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, and the van der Waerden, or normal scores, test. The present note also focuses attention on an aspect of the prob lem that is neglected in the literature: The equivalence of various nonparametric tests and their parametric counterparts performed on ranks, or the rank transfor mation concept, provides a rationale for the influence of unequal variances on test statistics calculated from ranks. MY PURPOSE in the present note is to call attention to a simple property of ranks that researchers and applied statisticians sometimes overlook when using statistical methods based on ranks. This property, noted by Pratt (1964) and Zaremba (1965), and later by many other authors, has implications for the prob lem of homogeneity of variance in statistical significance testing. It reveals that substitution of nonparametric methods for parametric tests such as t and F to overcome violation of the assumption, a procedure widely recommended in introductory textbooks, does not accomplish what is intended. Although some textbook authors have become aware of this problem in recent years, they have missed its connection with the rank transformation concept, or the equivalence of various nonparametric tests with parametric counterparts per formed on ranks replacing scores. In the present note, I emphasize that this con
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分数和等级方差的同质性注释
当任意两组或两组以上方差不等的分数组合在一起并排为一组时,相应的排名集继承不相等的方差。这一事实在非参数统计理论中是众所周知的,但在实践中,研究人员和应用统计学家经常忽略它的含义。由于这一性质,在统计显著性检验中,熟悉的非参数秩检验不能克服治疗组异质性方差的影响。一项模拟研究明确表明,分数到排名的转换减少了方差异质性,尽管不足以防止统计显著性检验(包括t检验、Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验和van der Waerden或正常分数检验)的I型和II型错误概率的严重扭曲。本说明还集中注意在文献中被忽视的问题的一个方面:对等级进行的各种非参数检验及其参数对应物的等价性,或等级转换概念,为不等方差对从等级计算的检验统计量的影响提供了一个基本原理。我在本说明中的目的是提请注意研究人员和应用统计学家在使用基于排名的统计方法时有时忽略的排名的一个简单属性。Pratt(1964)和Zaremba(1965)以及后来的许多其他作者都注意到这一性质,这对统计显著性检验中方差的同质性问题有影响。它揭示了用非参数方法代替参数检验(如t和F)来克服违反假设的情况,这是介绍性教科书中广泛推荐的一种方法,但并没有达到预期的目的。虽然近年来一些教科书的作者已经意识到这个问题,但他们忽略了它与秩变换概念的联系,或者在秩取代分数的情况下,各种非参数检验与参数检验的等价性。在本照会中,我强调这一点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
期刊最新文献
Full-Structured or Supported by Incremental Scaffolds? Effects on Perceived Competence and Motivation Same Classroom, Different Affordances? Demographic Differences in Perceptions of Motivational Climate in Five STEM Courses Newton Makes Me Happy: Cycling Emotions during Science Text Reading Working Memory and Automaticity in Relation to Mental Addition among American Elementary Students Demographic, psychosocial, and medical correlates ofpsychological morbidity after intensive care unit stay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1