Can a Teacher Intervention Improve Classroom Practices and Student Motivation in Mathematics

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 1998-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00220979809601404
D. Stipek, Karen B. Givvin, Julie M. Salmon, Valanne MacGyvers
{"title":"Can a Teacher Intervention Improve Classroom Practices and Student Motivation in Mathematics","authors":"D. Stipek, Karen B. Givvin, Julie M. Salmon, Valanne MacGyvers","doi":"10.1080/00220979809601404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Classroom practices believed to affect student motivation were assessed for 24 upper elementary school teachers during a unit on fractions. Two groups of mathematics “reform-minded” teachers participated in professional development programs—in either an intensive intervention or an intervention involving primarily teacher support. A 3rd group of teachers implemented traditional, textbased instruction and was not involved in any intervention. For most practices assessed, the 2 reform-minded groups of teachers did not differ significantly from each other, but both differed from the traditional teachers. The reform-minded teachers emphasized effort, mastery, and understanding more; encouraged student autonomy more; and created a psychologically safer environment than the traditional teachers did. The teachers in the intensive intervention, which included training in motivation, made more accurate judgments of students' motivation than the other reform-minded teachers did. There was modest evidence t...","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"66 1","pages":"319-337"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979809601404","citationCount":"74","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979809601404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 74

Abstract

Abstract Classroom practices believed to affect student motivation were assessed for 24 upper elementary school teachers during a unit on fractions. Two groups of mathematics “reform-minded” teachers participated in professional development programs—in either an intensive intervention or an intervention involving primarily teacher support. A 3rd group of teachers implemented traditional, textbased instruction and was not involved in any intervention. For most practices assessed, the 2 reform-minded groups of teachers did not differ significantly from each other, but both differed from the traditional teachers. The reform-minded teachers emphasized effort, mastery, and understanding more; encouraged student autonomy more; and created a psychologically safer environment than the traditional teachers did. The teachers in the intensive intervention, which included training in motivation, made more accurate judgments of students' motivation than the other reform-minded teachers did. There was modest evidence t...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师干预能改善课堂实践和学生的数学学习动机吗
摘要本研究以分数单元为研究对象,对24名小学高年级教师的课堂实践进行了评估。两组“有改革思想”的数学教师参加了专业发展计划——要么是强化干预,要么是主要由教师支持的干预。第三组教师实施传统的、基于文本的教学,不参与任何干预。在大多数实践评估中,两组具有改革意识的教师彼此之间没有显著差异,但两者都与传统教师不同。具有改革思想的教师更强调努力、掌握和理解;鼓励学生自主学习;创造了一个比传统教师更安全的心理环境。在包括动机训练在内的强化干预中,教师对学生动机的判断比其他具有改革思想的教师更准确。有适度的证据表明……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
期刊最新文献
Full-Structured or Supported by Incremental Scaffolds? Effects on Perceived Competence and Motivation Same Classroom, Different Affordances? Demographic Differences in Perceptions of Motivational Climate in Five STEM Courses Newton Makes Me Happy: Cycling Emotions during Science Text Reading Working Memory and Automaticity in Relation to Mental Addition among American Elementary Students Demographic, psychosocial, and medical correlates ofpsychological morbidity after intensive care unit stay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1