A Design-Sensitive Adjustment to the Parsimony Ratio for Evaluating Omnibus Fit of Structural Equation Models

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 1998-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00220979809604409
R. Hoyle
{"title":"A Design-Sensitive Adjustment to the Parsimony Ratio for Evaluating Omnibus Fit of Structural Equation Models","authors":"R. Hoyle","doi":"10.1080/00220979809604409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In response to Marsh and Hau's (1996) recent article on the potential for inferential errors when parsimony is rewarded in the evaluation of overall fit of structural equation models, Hoyle proposes a design-sensitive adjustment to the standard parsimony ratio. The design-sensitive parsimony ratio distinguishes be tween free parameters in a model that are discretionary and those that are required to reflect the design of the research. Hoyle argues that in parsimony adjustments to normed indices of omnibus fit, parameters dictated by research design should not contribute to the downward adjustment to fit indices effected by the parsimony ratio. A reconsideration of Marsh and Hau's example, a simplex model, showed that the design-sensitive parsimony ratio renders a more reasonable upper bound for parsimony indices than does the standard parsimony ratio. A brief description of 4 classes of research design for which the design-sensitive parsimony ratio should be used routinely is presented.","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"66 1","pages":"256-260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979809604409","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979809604409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In response to Marsh and Hau's (1996) recent article on the potential for inferential errors when parsimony is rewarded in the evaluation of overall fit of structural equation models, Hoyle proposes a design-sensitive adjustment to the standard parsimony ratio. The design-sensitive parsimony ratio distinguishes be tween free parameters in a model that are discretionary and those that are required to reflect the design of the research. Hoyle argues that in parsimony adjustments to normed indices of omnibus fit, parameters dictated by research design should not contribute to the downward adjustment to fit indices effected by the parsimony ratio. A reconsideration of Marsh and Hau's example, a simplex model, showed that the design-sensitive parsimony ratio renders a more reasonable upper bound for parsimony indices than does the standard parsimony ratio. A brief description of 4 classes of research design for which the design-sensitive parsimony ratio should be used routinely is presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结构方程模型综合拟合评价中简约率的设计敏感性调整
Marsh和Hau(1996)最近发表了一篇文章,讨论在评估结构方程模型的整体拟合时,当简约性得到奖励时,可能会出现推理错误,对此,Hoyle提出了对标准简约性比率的设计敏感调整。设计敏感的简约率区分了模型中的自由参数,这些参数是随意的,而这些参数是反映研究设计所必需的。Hoyle认为,在综合拟合规范指标的简约调整中,由研究设计决定的参数不应导致简约率影响的拟合指标向下调整。对Marsh和Hau的例子(一个单纯形模型)的重新考虑表明,设计敏感的节俭比率比标准的节俭比率提供了更合理的节俭指数上界。简要介绍了应常规使用设计敏感节俭比的4类研究设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
期刊最新文献
Full-Structured or Supported by Incremental Scaffolds? Effects on Perceived Competence and Motivation Same Classroom, Different Affordances? Demographic Differences in Perceptions of Motivational Climate in Five STEM Courses Newton Makes Me Happy: Cycling Emotions during Science Text Reading Working Memory and Automaticity in Relation to Mental Addition among American Elementary Students Demographic, psychosocial, and medical correlates ofpsychological morbidity after intensive care unit stay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1