Is up always good and down always bad?

IF 0.5 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Pragmatics & Cognition Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI:10.1075/pc.18006.tah
Mohamed Taha Mohamed
{"title":"Is up always good and down always bad?","authors":"Mohamed Taha Mohamed","doi":"10.1075/pc.18006.tah","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The current study investigates Arabic orientational metaphors in Modern Standard Arabic. Specifically, it is a\n corpus-based study that tries to retrieve conceptual orientational metaphors of up-down, front-back, right-left, and\n central-peripheral spatial orientation. The study assumes that every orientation can be described using a set of\n different lexemes, and these lexemes express different linguistic orientational metaphors with different levels of usage\n frequency. It is hypothesized that studying the relationships between these lexemes, their etymologies, and frequency can provide\n a detailed, integrative account of metaphorical aspects and conceptual systems related to each spatial orientation. A bottom-up\n methodology to identify metaphorical usages of spatial lexemes was applied to the Stanford Arabic Corpus. The\n results list the spatial linguistic metaphors comprising conceptual metaphors and show for each orientation that mapping\n orientations onto conceptual metaphors is a complicated process, which integrates linguistic and cognitive levels. The\n cognitive-perceptual and cultural implications of these findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45741,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics & Cognition","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18006.tah","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The current study investigates Arabic orientational metaphors in Modern Standard Arabic. Specifically, it is a corpus-based study that tries to retrieve conceptual orientational metaphors of up-down, front-back, right-left, and central-peripheral spatial orientation. The study assumes that every orientation can be described using a set of different lexemes, and these lexemes express different linguistic orientational metaphors with different levels of usage frequency. It is hypothesized that studying the relationships between these lexemes, their etymologies, and frequency can provide a detailed, integrative account of metaphorical aspects and conceptual systems related to each spatial orientation. A bottom-up methodology to identify metaphorical usages of spatial lexemes was applied to the Stanford Arabic Corpus. The results list the spatial linguistic metaphors comprising conceptual metaphors and show for each orientation that mapping orientations onto conceptual metaphors is a complicated process, which integrates linguistic and cognitive levels. The cognitive-perceptual and cultural implications of these findings are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向上总是好的,向下总是坏的吗?
本文主要研究现代标准阿拉伯语中的方位隐喻。具体来说,这是一项基于语料库的研究,试图检索上下、前后、左右和中央-外围空间方向的概念方位隐喻。本研究假设每个取向都可以用一组不同的词汇来描述,这些词汇表达了不同的语言取向隐喻,使用频率也不同。假设研究这些词汇、词源和频率之间的关系可以提供与每个空间方向相关的隐喻方面和概念系统的详细、综合的说明。在斯坦福大学阿拉伯语语料库中应用了一种自下而上的方法来识别空间词汇的隐喻用法。研究结果表明,空间语言隐喻是由概念隐喻构成的,在每个方位上,将方位映射到概念隐喻是一个复杂的过程,涉及语言和认知层面。这些发现的认知-知觉和文化含义进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Recalling presupposed information Too big to bind? Non-standard uses of hybrid evaluatives and the echoic view Linguistic and pragmatic ways of committing oneself The annotative dual-clause juxtaposition construction in Japanese
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1