{"title":"Colonial land law in dutch new guinea","authors":"A. Ploeg","doi":"10.1080/00223349908572902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Amendments proposed, in 1955, to the section of the New Guinea Act dealing with the recognition and alienation of land under indigenous tenure in Dutch New Guinea led to open debate. Orthodox views on the land rights of colonial subjects in the Dutch East Indies, and the criticisms levelled at the colonial administration by the distinguished legal expert, C. van Vollenhoven, provide a context for appreciating the debate over land law in Dutch New Guinea. The failure of the 1928 Agrarian Commission to introduce legislative change saw Dutch New Guinea, in 1949, inherit land legislation that had been in place since the late 19th century. The criticisms of the 1955 proposals voiced by V.E. Korn, van Vollenhoven's successor at Leiden, lie at the centre of a debate which essentially turned upon differing visions over the future of Dutch New Guinea and the nature of the relationship between Dutch residents and the indigenous New Guineans.","PeriodicalId":45229,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PACIFIC HISTORY","volume":"34 1","pages":"191-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00223349908572902","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF PACIFIC HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223349908572902","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Amendments proposed, in 1955, to the section of the New Guinea Act dealing with the recognition and alienation of land under indigenous tenure in Dutch New Guinea led to open debate. Orthodox views on the land rights of colonial subjects in the Dutch East Indies, and the criticisms levelled at the colonial administration by the distinguished legal expert, C. van Vollenhoven, provide a context for appreciating the debate over land law in Dutch New Guinea. The failure of the 1928 Agrarian Commission to introduce legislative change saw Dutch New Guinea, in 1949, inherit land legislation that had been in place since the late 19th century. The criticisms of the 1955 proposals voiced by V.E. Korn, van Vollenhoven's successor at Leiden, lie at the centre of a debate which essentially turned upon differing visions over the future of Dutch New Guinea and the nature of the relationship between Dutch residents and the indigenous New Guineans.
1955年对《新几内亚法》中关于承认和转让荷属新几内亚土著土地的部分提出的修正案引发了公开辩论。关于荷属东印度群岛殖民地居民土地权的正统观点,以及著名法律专家C. van Vollenhoven对殖民行政当局的批评,为了解荷属新几内亚土地法的辩论提供了一个背景。1928年农业委员会未能引入立法改革,1949年荷属新几内亚继承了自19世纪末以来一直存在的土地立法。范·伏伦霍芬在莱顿的继任者V.E.科恩对1955年各项建议提出的批评是一场辩论的核心,这场辩论基本上是围绕荷属新几内亚的未来和荷兰居民与土著新几内亚人之间关系的性质的不同看法展开的。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pacific History is a refereed international journal serving historians, prehistorians, anthropologists and others interested in the study of mankind in the Pacific Islands (including Hawaii and New Guinea), and is concerned generally with political, economic, religious and cultural factors affecting human presence there. It publishes articles, annotated previously unpublished manuscripts, notes on source material and comment on current affairs. It also welcomes articles on other geographical regions, such as Africa and Southeast Asia, or of a theoretical character, where these are concerned with problems of significance in the Pacific.