Making the Personal Civil: The Protector's Office and the Administration of Indian Personal Law in Colonial Natal, 1872 – 1907

Nafisa Essop Sheik
{"title":"Making the Personal Civil: The Protector's Office and the Administration of Indian Personal Law in Colonial Natal, 1872 – 1907","authors":"Nafisa Essop Sheik","doi":"10.1080/02590123.2005.11964130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2 The contemporary legal meaning of personal law is ‘the system of law which applies to a person and his (sic) transactions determined by the law of his (sic) tribe, religious group, caste, or other personal factor, as distinct from the territorial law of the country to which he belongs, in which he finds himself, or in which the transaction takes place.’ See D.M Walker, Oxford Companion to Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980. Historically, however, the creation and definition of Personal Law was more complicated. Under the British administration of India (East India Company) and sovereignty (British Charter for India), the Westminster and Common Law models were introduced. However, the imported Rule of Law was rendered almost unworkable by the existence in India of a great diversity of customs, cultural traditions, regional legal systems, group identities and community memberships. Initially colonialists tended to ignore traditional cultural practices, ritual legalism, textual records of moral thinking (Arthashastras, Dharmashastras, Yanjavalkyasmriti, nibandhas, Manusmirti, and so on). By the late 1700s, the British administration would attempt to accommodate aspects of the personal or an artificially separated private area of morality from the public civil and criminal codes under the newlyevolved jurisdiction of Personal Law. See http://www.law.emory.edu/IFL/cases/India.htm for more on this.","PeriodicalId":88545,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natal and Zulu history","volume":"23 1","pages":"43 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02590123.2005.11964130","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natal and Zulu history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02590123.2005.11964130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

2 The contemporary legal meaning of personal law is ‘the system of law which applies to a person and his (sic) transactions determined by the law of his (sic) tribe, religious group, caste, or other personal factor, as distinct from the territorial law of the country to which he belongs, in which he finds himself, or in which the transaction takes place.’ See D.M Walker, Oxford Companion to Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980. Historically, however, the creation and definition of Personal Law was more complicated. Under the British administration of India (East India Company) and sovereignty (British Charter for India), the Westminster and Common Law models were introduced. However, the imported Rule of Law was rendered almost unworkable by the existence in India of a great diversity of customs, cultural traditions, regional legal systems, group identities and community memberships. Initially colonialists tended to ignore traditional cultural practices, ritual legalism, textual records of moral thinking (Arthashastras, Dharmashastras, Yanjavalkyasmriti, nibandhas, Manusmirti, and so on). By the late 1700s, the British administration would attempt to accommodate aspects of the personal or an artificially separated private area of morality from the public civil and criminal codes under the newlyevolved jurisdiction of Personal Law. See http://www.law.emory.edu/IFL/cases/India.htm for more on this.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使个人民事化:1872 - 1907年殖民地纳塔尔的保护者办公室和印度个人法的管理
2 .属人法的当代法律含义是“适用于个人及其交易的法律体系,该法律体系由其部落、宗教团体、种姓或其他个人因素的法律决定,与他所属、他发现自己所在或交易发生所在国家的领土法律不同。”参见d.m. Walker,《牛津法律指南》。牛津:牛津大学出版社,1980。然而,从历史上看,属人法的产生和定义更为复杂。在英国对印度的管理(东印度公司)和主权(英国印度宪章)下,引入了威斯敏斯特法和普通法模式。然而,由于印度存在着各种各样的习俗、文化传统、区域法律制度、群体特征和社区成员,引进的法治几乎无法实行。最初,殖民主义者倾向于忽视传统的文化习俗、仪式的法家主义、道德思想的文本记录(Arthashastras、Dharmashastras、Yanjavalkyasmriti、nibandhas、Manusmirti等)。到18世纪末,英国的政府将试图将个人方面或人为分离的私人道德领域与公共民事和刑事法典相适应,纳入新涉及的属人法管辖范围。请参阅http://www.law.emory.edu/IFL/cases/India.htm了解更多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Voices of Liberation: Fatima Meer, a Free Mind Neglected Archive: Museum Collections of Locally Forged Hoes as Evidence of Contributions by Women to the Agricultural Economy of the Phongolo-Mzimkhulu Region Prior to the Twentieth Century Racial and Generational Issues in Competitive Cycle Racing in Durban in the Closing Decades of the Twentieth Century: A Case Study of the Triangle Cycling Club Editorial Indenture in Language: The Words the Workers Made
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1