Population Movements, Islam and the Interaction of Indian and African Identity Strategies in South Africa During and After Apartheid

Preben Kaarsholm
{"title":"Population Movements, Islam and the Interaction of Indian and African Identity Strategies in South Africa During and After Apartheid","authors":"Preben Kaarsholm","doi":"10.1080/02590123.2006.11964136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colonialist segregation and, subsequently, apartheid in South Africa were centrally focused on the control of population movement, and a central prerogative of the state was the authority to delimit the boundaries between populations and to codify the characteristics of their difference. Against this power of the colonial and the apartheid state were poised the energies of people depending for their livelihoods on movement and capacity to circumvent and demobilise the obstacles placed in their way by geographical restrictions and state authorised definitions of identity. At the same time, the groups of population subjected to such forms of power also sought the recognition of the state, and interacted with it around attempts to fixate boundaries and identities in order to consolidate their own strategic position and situation within the hegemony of cultures, on which the legitimation of state power depended. Following the demise of apartheid and its deconstruction into constitutional democracy after 1994, such confrontations, struggles and manoeuvres have continued, and new types of battles around citizenship and entitlements have emerged in the context of both immigration and affirmative action for greater social justice. \n \nThis article sets out to examine some of the institutional frameworks and discourses through which African and Indian identities have been articulated, confronted and negotiated in South Africa – and in what is now KwaZulu-Natal in particular – from colonialism and the apartheid era to the “New South Africa.” It discusses some of the ambiguities inherent in Islamic identity formation, and looks at ways in which it has interacted with other strands of identification, with Indian as well as African nationalism in South Africa. In what is now KwaZulu-Natal, Islam has quite predominantly belonged to people of Indian origin– though from very different backgrounds – and has provided an important register of discourse and organisation for both the unification and delimitation of Indian identities against others as well as for the articulation and debate of cultural and political differences within the Indian “community.” African Islam in KwaZulu-Natal has been of much more limited dimensions and – until recently – has been kept carefully apart and segregated from the world of Indian Islam. \n \nWith the onset of new programmes and mobilisations for dawah among Africans (starting with the work of Achmet Deedat and the Islamic Propagation Centre International from 1957 onwards), with a new political playing field opening up after 1994, and the waves of transnational migration following it, the relationship between Indian and African Islam has begun to change, and new varieties of Islamic discourse and institution building have come about. The paper argues that the impact of these new energies of islamisation is in itself ambivalent: On the one hand it offers possibilities for new dialogue and elaboration of ideas of citizenship across historical divides of racial segregation and discrimination. On the other hand, it also provides the possibility for new hardenings of identity and of new types of confrontation between groups keen to exploit and monopolise the cultural capital represented by Islam.","PeriodicalId":88545,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natal and Zulu history","volume":"24 1","pages":"37 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02590123.2006.11964136","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natal and Zulu history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02590123.2006.11964136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Colonialist segregation and, subsequently, apartheid in South Africa were centrally focused on the control of population movement, and a central prerogative of the state was the authority to delimit the boundaries between populations and to codify the characteristics of their difference. Against this power of the colonial and the apartheid state were poised the energies of people depending for their livelihoods on movement and capacity to circumvent and demobilise the obstacles placed in their way by geographical restrictions and state authorised definitions of identity. At the same time, the groups of population subjected to such forms of power also sought the recognition of the state, and interacted with it around attempts to fixate boundaries and identities in order to consolidate their own strategic position and situation within the hegemony of cultures, on which the legitimation of state power depended. Following the demise of apartheid and its deconstruction into constitutional democracy after 1994, such confrontations, struggles and manoeuvres have continued, and new types of battles around citizenship and entitlements have emerged in the context of both immigration and affirmative action for greater social justice. This article sets out to examine some of the institutional frameworks and discourses through which African and Indian identities have been articulated, confronted and negotiated in South Africa – and in what is now KwaZulu-Natal in particular – from colonialism and the apartheid era to the “New South Africa.” It discusses some of the ambiguities inherent in Islamic identity formation, and looks at ways in which it has interacted with other strands of identification, with Indian as well as African nationalism in South Africa. In what is now KwaZulu-Natal, Islam has quite predominantly belonged to people of Indian origin– though from very different backgrounds – and has provided an important register of discourse and organisation for both the unification and delimitation of Indian identities against others as well as for the articulation and debate of cultural and political differences within the Indian “community.” African Islam in KwaZulu-Natal has been of much more limited dimensions and – until recently – has been kept carefully apart and segregated from the world of Indian Islam. With the onset of new programmes and mobilisations for dawah among Africans (starting with the work of Achmet Deedat and the Islamic Propagation Centre International from 1957 onwards), with a new political playing field opening up after 1994, and the waves of transnational migration following it, the relationship between Indian and African Islam has begun to change, and new varieties of Islamic discourse and institution building have come about. The paper argues that the impact of these new energies of islamisation is in itself ambivalent: On the one hand it offers possibilities for new dialogue and elaboration of ideas of citizenship across historical divides of racial segregation and discrimination. On the other hand, it also provides the possibility for new hardenings of identity and of new types of confrontation between groups keen to exploit and monopolise the cultural capital represented by Islam.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族隔离期间和之后南非的人口流动、伊斯兰教和印度和非洲认同战略的相互作用
在南非,殖民主义的种族隔离和后来的种族隔离主要集中在控制人口流动上,国家的一项主要特权是划定人口之间的界限,并将他们的差异特征编纂成法律。为了反对殖民和种族隔离国家的这种权力,依靠流动和能力来谋生的人民准备好了力量,以规避和消除因地理限制和国家授权的身份定义而设置在他们道路上的障碍。与此同时,受制于这种权力形式的人口群体也寻求国家的承认,并围绕固定边界和身份的企图与国家互动,以巩固自己在文化霸权中的战略地位和地位,而国家权力的合法性依赖于文化霸权。1994年后,随着种族隔离制度的消亡及其解构为宪政民主,这种对抗、斗争和策略仍在继续,在移民和争取更大社会正义的平权行动的背景下,围绕公民身份和权利的新型斗争出现了。本文将探讨一些制度框架和话语,通过这些框架和话语,非洲人和印度人的身份在南非,特别是在现在的夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省,从殖民主义和种族隔离时代到“新南非”,得以清晰地表达、面对和谈判。它讨论了伊斯兰身份形成中固有的一些模糊性,并研究了它与其他身份认同的相互作用方式,与南非的印度和非洲民族主义。在现在的夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省,伊斯兰教主要属于印度裔人——尽管他们的背景非常不同——并为印度人身份的统一和界定以及印度“社区”内文化和政治差异的表达和辩论提供了重要的话语和组织。夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的非洲伊斯兰教的规模要有限得多,直到最近,一直与印度伊斯兰教世界小心地分开和隔离。随着新项目的开始和非洲人对达瓦的动员(从1957年开始,阿赫梅特·迪达特和伊斯兰传播中心国际组织的工作开始),随着1994年后新的政治竞争环境的开放,以及随之而来的跨国移民浪潮,印度和非洲伊斯兰教之间的关系开始发生变化,新的伊斯兰话语和制度建设已经出现。本文认为,这些伊斯兰化的新能量的影响本身是矛盾的:一方面,它为跨越种族隔离和歧视的历史鸿沟的新的对话和阐述公民思想提供了可能性。另一方面,它也为渴望利用和垄断以伊斯兰教为代表的文化资本的群体之间的新身份和新类型的对抗提供了可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Voices of Liberation: Fatima Meer, a Free Mind Neglected Archive: Museum Collections of Locally Forged Hoes as Evidence of Contributions by Women to the Agricultural Economy of the Phongolo-Mzimkhulu Region Prior to the Twentieth Century Racial and Generational Issues in Competitive Cycle Racing in Durban in the Closing Decades of the Twentieth Century: A Case Study of the Triangle Cycling Club Editorial Indenture in Language: The Words the Workers Made
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1