Strobe lights versus auditory smoke alarm signals: Effectiveness for waking up selected populations

D. Bruck, I. Thomas
{"title":"Strobe lights versus auditory smoke alarm signals: Effectiveness for waking up selected populations","authors":"D. Bruck, I. Thomas","doi":"10.1080/03033910.2009.10446296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strobe lights are recommended in the USA and elsewhere as a suitable emergency notification signal for waking the deafor hard ofhearing (NFPA 72, 2002 standard). This paper reviews the relevant literature, and reports on the waking effectiveness of strobe lights (177 candela or more) in comparison to the current high pitched smoke alarm and a low frequency square wave tone (520 Hz dominant frequency). The signals were activated at increasing intensity levels during slow wave (deep) sleep in two groups: (i) 38 adults aged 18–77 years with mild to moderately severe hearing loss in the range of 25–70dBA in both ears, and (ii) 32 young adults aged 18–26 years impaired with alcohol at 0.05 blood alcohol content. It was found that three quarters ofthe participants slept through the strobe light activated at above the recommended intensity of the standard. Further, adding a strobe light to a current smoke alarm signal is likely to be less effective at waking participants than sounding a low frequency square wave...","PeriodicalId":91174,"journal":{"name":"The Irish journal of psychology","volume":"30 1","pages":"21-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03033910.2009.10446296","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Irish journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2009.10446296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Strobe lights are recommended in the USA and elsewhere as a suitable emergency notification signal for waking the deafor hard ofhearing (NFPA 72, 2002 standard). This paper reviews the relevant literature, and reports on the waking effectiveness of strobe lights (177 candela or more) in comparison to the current high pitched smoke alarm and a low frequency square wave tone (520 Hz dominant frequency). The signals were activated at increasing intensity levels during slow wave (deep) sleep in two groups: (i) 38 adults aged 18–77 years with mild to moderately severe hearing loss in the range of 25–70dBA in both ears, and (ii) 32 young adults aged 18–26 years impaired with alcohol at 0.05 blood alcohol content. It was found that three quarters ofthe participants slept through the strobe light activated at above the recommended intensity of the standard. Further, adding a strobe light to a current smoke alarm signal is likely to be less effective at waking participants than sounding a low frequency square wave...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
频闪灯与听觉烟雾警报信号:唤醒选定人群的有效性
频闪灯在美国和其他地方被推荐作为一种合适的紧急通知信号,用于唤醒失聪者(NFPA 72, 2002标准)。本文回顾了相关文献,并报道了频闪灯(177坎ela或更高)与当前的高音调烟雾报警器和低频方波音调(520 Hz主导频率)的唤醒效果。在两组慢波(深度)睡眠期间,信号以不断增加的强度被激活:(i) 38名年龄在18-77岁之间,双耳听力损失在25-70dBA范围内的轻度至中度的成年人;(ii) 32名年龄在18-26岁之间的年轻人,血液酒精含量为0.05。研究发现,四分之三的参与者在高于推荐标准强度的频闪灯下睡觉。此外,在当前的烟雾警报信号中添加频闪灯,唤醒参与者的效果可能不如发出低频方波。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prospective Evaluation of Hearing Status in Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia. Service users’ experiences of life supported by an Irish mental health service still battling with implementing recovery-orientated principles Teenage parenthood and child externalising and internalising problems: evidence from the ‘Growing Up in Ireland’ study Predictive role of risk and protective factors before and after suicide intervention therapy Elite athlete receptivity to sport psychology consulting in Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1