Strategies for deploying theory of mind in adults: theory vs simulation is not either/or

L. Ball, M. Besozzi, S. E. Ball, Lyndsay Anderson, Trina Geye
{"title":"Strategies for deploying theory of mind in adults: theory vs simulation is not either/or","authors":"L. Ball, M. Besozzi, S. E. Ball, Lyndsay Anderson, Trina Geye","doi":"10.1080/03033910.2013.808160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finding measures of theory of mind (ToM) that are robustly related to contemporary measures of personality, we developed 10 scenarios reflecting either folk theory or simulation approaches to ToM deployment. Participants responded to scenarios in one of three formats: (1) by endorsing different descriptions representing possible thought processes of a scenario's protagonist, (2) by guessing whether protagonists had used folk theory or simulation strategy, or (3) by rating the protagonist's use of both strategies using Likert scales. Persons who used the second two rating formats received descriptions of the concepts of folk theory and simulation. Females and those rating possible thought processes, specifically format (1), had significantly greater tendency to endorse folk theory models than did males or those who simply selected theory or simulation (2). Moreover, participants who had more siblings or who fell late in family birth order were more inclined to select folk theory strategies. Individually, s...","PeriodicalId":91174,"journal":{"name":"The Irish journal of psychology","volume":"34 1","pages":"81-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03033910.2013.808160","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Irish journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2013.808160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Finding measures of theory of mind (ToM) that are robustly related to contemporary measures of personality, we developed 10 scenarios reflecting either folk theory or simulation approaches to ToM deployment. Participants responded to scenarios in one of three formats: (1) by endorsing different descriptions representing possible thought processes of a scenario's protagonist, (2) by guessing whether protagonists had used folk theory or simulation strategy, or (3) by rating the protagonist's use of both strategies using Likert scales. Persons who used the second two rating formats received descriptions of the concepts of folk theory and simulation. Females and those rating possible thought processes, specifically format (1), had significantly greater tendency to endorse folk theory models than did males or those who simply selected theory or simulation (2). Moreover, participants who had more siblings or who fell late in family birth order were more inclined to select folk theory strategies. Individually, s...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在成人中运用心理理论的策略:理论与模拟不是非此即彼的
为了找到与当代人格测量密切相关的心理理论(ToM)测量方法,我们开发了10个场景,反映了民间理论或模拟方法对ToM部署的影响。参与者对场景的反应有三种形式:(1)通过支持代表场景主角可能的思维过程的不同描述,(2)猜测主角是使用民间理论还是模拟策略,或(3)使用李克特量表评估主角对两种策略的使用情况。使用后两种评分格式的人收到了民间理论和模拟概念的描述。女性和那些评价可能的思维过程的人,特别是格式(1),比男性或那些简单地选择理论或模拟(2)的人更倾向于支持民间理论模型。此外,有更多兄弟姐妹或家庭出生顺序较晚的参与者更倾向于选择民间理论策略。单独的…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prospective Evaluation of Hearing Status in Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia. Service users’ experiences of life supported by an Irish mental health service still battling with implementing recovery-orientated principles Teenage parenthood and child externalising and internalising problems: evidence from the ‘Growing Up in Ireland’ study Predictive role of risk and protective factors before and after suicide intervention therapy Elite athlete receptivity to sport psychology consulting in Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1