What is driving the community structure of insects in arid ecosystems of Southern Africa? An example with blister beetles (Coleoptera: Meloidae)

Pub Date : 2016-01-02 DOI:10.1080/03946975.2016.1142308
M. Pitzalis, V. Amore, F. Montalto, L. Luiselli, M. Bologna
{"title":"What is driving the community structure of insects in arid ecosystems of Southern Africa? An example with blister beetles (Coleoptera: Meloidae)","authors":"M. Pitzalis, V. Amore, F. Montalto, L. Luiselli, M. Bologna","doi":"10.1080/03946975.2016.1142308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A considerable part of community ecology literature questioned what are the main drivers of ecological relationships in an organismal community. We analysed this focal question by studying blister beetle (Meloidae) assemblages in Southern Africa. We explored the ecological distribution of 48 species across underlying bioclimatic (e.g. temperatures and precipitation regimes), environmental factors (biomes, vegetation structure) and the taxonomic heterogeneity of each groups inhabiting major biomes of Namibia across their main biological and ecological traits, by Canonical Correspondence in order to get an ordination plot. Monte Carlo methods were used to test for randomness of the data ordination. Ordination plot identified three main assemblages, one being constituted by strictly semiarid savannah species (camelthorn, mountain, karstweld, thornbush, mixed tree and shrub, dwarf shrub, mopane and forest savannahs), one much larger and less homogenous second assemblage, inclusive of more generalist species from Karoo and semi-desert habitats, living also in arid savannahs, and the third one including Nama Karoo species. All the three assemblages were taxonomically very heterogeneous, showing that phylogenetic relationships are probably less relevant than interspecific ecological relationships among species of the same group to determine present-day community structure in these animals.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03946975.2016.1142308","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03946975.2016.1142308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A considerable part of community ecology literature questioned what are the main drivers of ecological relationships in an organismal community. We analysed this focal question by studying blister beetle (Meloidae) assemblages in Southern Africa. We explored the ecological distribution of 48 species across underlying bioclimatic (e.g. temperatures and precipitation regimes), environmental factors (biomes, vegetation structure) and the taxonomic heterogeneity of each groups inhabiting major biomes of Namibia across their main biological and ecological traits, by Canonical Correspondence in order to get an ordination plot. Monte Carlo methods were used to test for randomness of the data ordination. Ordination plot identified three main assemblages, one being constituted by strictly semiarid savannah species (camelthorn, mountain, karstweld, thornbush, mixed tree and shrub, dwarf shrub, mopane and forest savannahs), one much larger and less homogenous second assemblage, inclusive of more generalist species from Karoo and semi-desert habitats, living also in arid savannahs, and the third one including Nama Karoo species. All the three assemblages were taxonomically very heterogeneous, showing that phylogenetic relationships are probably less relevant than interspecific ecological relationships among species of the same group to determine present-day community structure in these animals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
是什么推动了非洲南部干旱生态系统中昆虫的群落结构?以水疱甲虫为例(鞘翅目:虫科)
相当一部分群落生态学文献质疑有机群落中生态关系的主要驱动因素是什么。我们通过研究非洲南部的水疱甲虫(水疱甲虫科)组合来分析这个焦点问题。利用典型对应方法,研究了48个物种在不同生物气候(如温度和降水)、环境因子(生物群落、植被结构)下的生态分布,以及在纳米比亚主要生物群落中各类群的主要生物和生态特征的分类学异质性,以获得排序图。采用蒙特卡罗方法检验数据排序的随机性。排序样地确定了三个主要组合,一个是由严格的半干旱稀树草原物种组成的(骆驼刺、山地、喀山、荆棘、混交树和灌木、矮灌木、毛木和森林稀树草原),一个更大但不太均匀的第二组合,包括来自卡鲁和半沙漠生境的更多的通才物种,也生活在干旱的稀树草原上,第三个包括纳玛卡鲁物种。所有这三个组合在分类上都非常异质,这表明在确定这些动物当今的群落结构时,系统发育关系可能不如同一类群物种之间的种间生态关系相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1