Assessment of Social Competence for Pilot Selection

Hans-Juergen Hoermann, P. Goerke
{"title":"Assessment of Social Competence for Pilot Selection","authors":"Hans-Juergen Hoermann, P. Goerke","doi":"10.1080/10508414.2014.860843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To ensure that pilots possess the necessary skills for effective teamwork during line operation, airlines have introduced various diagnostic methods into their selection procedures that are designed to assess the social competence of pilot applicants prior to employment. A validation study with N = 292 ab initio pilots for a major European airline is described, in which assessment center (AC) methods have been compared with questionnaires on social competence and personality. Results show moderate to high correlations between 2 social competence questionnaires and certain personality dimensions, although only 1 social competence questionnaire (the Social Skills Inventory [SSI]) confirms systematic common variance with the behavior-oriented assessments of related concepts in the AC. In addition to traditional selection procedures, the SSI could neither improve the prediction of applicants’ overall performance in pilot selection nor did it show substantial intercorrelations with an external criterion in the pilot training. Therefore, social competence and personality questionnaires could serve as an additional component in the preselection, but might not replace the AC, which provides information about the behavioral component of social competence in real social interactions.","PeriodicalId":83071,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of aviation psychology","volume":"24 1","pages":"28 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508414.2014.860843","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of aviation psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2014.860843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

To ensure that pilots possess the necessary skills for effective teamwork during line operation, airlines have introduced various diagnostic methods into their selection procedures that are designed to assess the social competence of pilot applicants prior to employment. A validation study with N = 292 ab initio pilots for a major European airline is described, in which assessment center (AC) methods have been compared with questionnaires on social competence and personality. Results show moderate to high correlations between 2 social competence questionnaires and certain personality dimensions, although only 1 social competence questionnaire (the Social Skills Inventory [SSI]) confirms systematic common variance with the behavior-oriented assessments of related concepts in the AC. In addition to traditional selection procedures, the SSI could neither improve the prediction of applicants’ overall performance in pilot selection nor did it show substantial intercorrelations with an external criterion in the pilot training. Therefore, social competence and personality questionnaires could serve as an additional component in the preselection, but might not replace the AC, which provides information about the behavioral component of social competence in real social interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会能力评估对飞行员选择的影响
为了确保飞行员拥有必要的技能,有效的团队合作,在线路运行中,航空公司已经引入了各种诊断方法到他们的选择程序,旨在评估社会能力的飞行员申请人就业前。本文对欧洲某大型航空公司的292名从头开始的飞行员进行了验证性研究,并将评估中心(AC)方法与社会能力和人格问卷进行了比较。结果显示,两份社会能力问卷与某些人格维度之间存在中等到高度的相关性,尽管只有一份社会能力问卷(社会技能量表[SSI])证实了与AC中相关概念的行为导向评估有系统的共同差异。SSI既不能提高申请人在飞行员选拔中的整体表现的预测,也没有显示出与飞行员培训中的外部标准的实质性相互关系。因此,社会能力和人格问卷可以作为预选的一个额外成分,但可能无法取代AC,后者提供了真实社会交往中社会能力行为成分的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EOV Editorial Board Gaze Behavior and Visual Attention: A Review of Eye Tracking Studies in Aviation The International Journal of Aviation Psychology Reviewers 2016 Exposure to Disturbance Motion During Practice in an Analog of a Flight Task Influences Flight Control of Naive Participants Investigating Non-Technical Skills in Scottish and English Aircraft Maintenance Teams Using a Mixed Methodology of Interviews and a Questionnaire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1