Four seed-quality measures in orchids with different pollination systems

Mirjam Metsare, Aigi Ilves, M. Haldna, T. Kull, Kadri Tali
{"title":"Four seed-quality measures in orchids with different pollination systems","authors":"Mirjam Metsare, Aigi Ilves, M. Haldna, T. Kull, Kadri Tali","doi":"10.1080/12538078.2015.1100549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The number of seeds is an indicator of plant fitness. We compared four quality measures – seed number, abortion, viability and germination. To test as wide a span of seed variability as possible, we cross-pollinated and self-pollinated one nectarless and one nectar-rewarding orchid species, assuming that nectariferous species should be more adapted to geitonogamous selfing than the cheating one and that seed quality should reflect that. Seed number for both species was lowest in selfed fruits. Viability and germination did not show any difference in deceptive Orchis militaris treatments, but the trend was different in rewarding Platanthera bifolia. Seed number and seed abortion correlated well as did viability and germination in vitro. This shows that these two stages are controlled by different mechanisms. Therefore, seed number or seed abortion rate alone cannot be proxies for reproductive output.","PeriodicalId":7129,"journal":{"name":"Acta Botanica Gallica","volume":"162 1","pages":"263 - 269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/12538078.2015.1100549","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Botanica Gallica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12538078.2015.1100549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract The number of seeds is an indicator of plant fitness. We compared four quality measures – seed number, abortion, viability and germination. To test as wide a span of seed variability as possible, we cross-pollinated and self-pollinated one nectarless and one nectar-rewarding orchid species, assuming that nectariferous species should be more adapted to geitonogamous selfing than the cheating one and that seed quality should reflect that. Seed number for both species was lowest in selfed fruits. Viability and germination did not show any difference in deceptive Orchis militaris treatments, but the trend was different in rewarding Platanthera bifolia. Seed number and seed abortion correlated well as did viability and germination in vitro. This shows that these two stages are controlled by different mechanisms. Therefore, seed number or seed abortion rate alone cannot be proxies for reproductive output.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同授粉系统兰科植物种子品质的四种测定方法
摘要种子数是植物适合度的一个指标。我们比较了种子数、败育率、生存力和发芽率四个质量指标。为了测试尽可能广泛的种子变异性,我们对一种无花蜜的兰花和一种有花蜜的兰花进行了异花授粉和自花授粉,假设有花蜜的兰花比有花蜜的兰花更适应雌雄同体的自交,并且种子质量应该反映这一点。两种种子数在自交果实中最低。在诱骗性军兰处理中,植物的生存力和发芽率无显著差异,而在奖励性双歧花处理中则有显著差异。种子数与种子败育的相关性较好,离体种子活力与萌发的相关性也较好。这说明这两个阶段受不同的机制控制。因此,单凭种子数或种子败育率不能代表生殖产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating and Tracking Qualitative Content Coder Performance Using Item Response Theory. Distribution, morphology and habitats of Elatine triandra (Elatinaceae) in Europe, with particular reference to the central part of the continent Germination requirements of nine European Aegilops species in relation to constant and alternating temperatures Taxonomy and conservation of Pancratium maritimum (Amaryllidaceae) and relatives in the Central Mediterranean Contribution to the flora of Asian and European countries: new national and regional vascular plant records, 4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1