Designed sampling from large databases for controlled trials

Liwen Ouyang, D. Apley, Sanjay Mehrotra
{"title":"Designed sampling from large databases for controlled trials","authors":"Liwen Ouyang, D. Apley, Sanjay Mehrotra","doi":"10.1080/0740817X.2016.1189633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Controlled trials are ubiquitously used to investigate the effect of a medical treatment. The trial outcome can be dependent on a set of patient covariates. Traditional approaches have relied primarily on randomized patient sampling and allocation to treatment and control groups. However, when covariate data for a large set of patients are available and the dependence of the outcome on the covariates is of interest, one can potentially design treatment/control groups that provide better estimates of the covariate-dependent effects of the treatment or provide similarly accurate estimates with a smaller trial cohort size. In this article, we develop an approach that uses optimal Design Of Experiments (DOE) concepts to select the patients for the treatment and control groups upfront, based on their covariate values, in a manner that optimizes the information content in the data. For the optimal treatment and control groups selection, we develop simple guidelines and an optimization algorithm that achieves much more accurate estimates of the covariate-dependent effects of the treatment than random sampling. We demonstrate the advantage of our method through both theoretical and numerical performance comparisons. The advantages are more pronounced when the trial cohort size is smaller, relative to the number of records in the database. Moreover, our approach causes no sampling bias in the estimated effects, for the same reason that DOE principles do not bias estimated effects. Although we focus on medical treatment assessment, the approach has applicability in many analytics application domains where one wants to conduct a controlled experimental study to identify the covariate-dependent effects of a factor (e.g., a marketing sales promotion), based on a sample of study subjects selected optimally from a large database of covariates.","PeriodicalId":13379,"journal":{"name":"IIE Transactions","volume":"48 1","pages":"1087 - 1097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0740817X.2016.1189633","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2016.1189633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Controlled trials are ubiquitously used to investigate the effect of a medical treatment. The trial outcome can be dependent on a set of patient covariates. Traditional approaches have relied primarily on randomized patient sampling and allocation to treatment and control groups. However, when covariate data for a large set of patients are available and the dependence of the outcome on the covariates is of interest, one can potentially design treatment/control groups that provide better estimates of the covariate-dependent effects of the treatment or provide similarly accurate estimates with a smaller trial cohort size. In this article, we develop an approach that uses optimal Design Of Experiments (DOE) concepts to select the patients for the treatment and control groups upfront, based on their covariate values, in a manner that optimizes the information content in the data. For the optimal treatment and control groups selection, we develop simple guidelines and an optimization algorithm that achieves much more accurate estimates of the covariate-dependent effects of the treatment than random sampling. We demonstrate the advantage of our method through both theoretical and numerical performance comparisons. The advantages are more pronounced when the trial cohort size is smaller, relative to the number of records in the database. Moreover, our approach causes no sampling bias in the estimated effects, for the same reason that DOE principles do not bias estimated effects. Although we focus on medical treatment assessment, the approach has applicability in many analytics application domains where one wants to conduct a controlled experimental study to identify the covariate-dependent effects of a factor (e.g., a marketing sales promotion), based on a sample of study subjects selected optimally from a large database of covariates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从大型数据库中为对照试验设计抽样
对照试验普遍用于研究药物治疗的效果。试验结果可能依赖于一组患者协变量。传统的方法主要依赖于随机的患者抽样和分配到治疗组和对照组。然而,当大量患者的协变量数据可用,并且结果对协变量的依赖性很感兴趣时,可以设计治疗/对照组,以更好地估计治疗的协变量依赖效应,或以较小的试验队列规模提供类似的准确估计。在本文中,我们开发了一种方法,该方法使用最佳实验设计(DOE)概念,以优化数据中的信息内容的方式,根据其协变量值预先选择治疗组和对照组的患者。对于最佳治疗和对照组的选择,我们制定了简单的指导方针和优化算法,以实现比随机抽样更准确地估计治疗的协变量依赖效应。我们通过理论和数值性能比较证明了我们的方法的优势。相对于数据库中的记录数量,当试验队列规模较小时,优势更为明显。此外,我们的方法在估计的效果中不会引起抽样偏差,原因与DOE原理不会使估计的效果产生偏差相同。虽然我们关注的是医疗评估,但该方法适用于许多分析应用领域,在这些领域中,人们希望进行对照实验研究,以确定一个因素(例如,营销促销)的协变量依赖效应,这是基于从大型协变量数据库中选择最佳的研究对象样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IIE Transactions
IIE Transactions 工程技术-工程:工业
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊最新文献
EOV Focus Area Editorial Boards Strategic health workforce planning Efficient computation of the likelihood expansions for diffusion models An introduction to optimal power flow: Theory, formulation, and examples An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1