{"title":"BEGINNINGS","authors":"Gurminder K. Bhambra","doi":"10.1080/13698010500515290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Edward W. Said has advocated the crossing of boundaries while at the same time abjuring the existence of those very boundaries. In practice, this has been played out in his opposition to nationalism existing alongside his support for the Palestinian people / a relationship that many have regarded as paradoxical if not contradictory. Said’s regard for nationalist movements, as having progressive and liberatory potential, stands alongside his recognition of the bleaker, more regressive, aspects of nationalism. Narratives of nationalism sit uneasily with those of emancipation which, as Said argues, are ‘narratives of integration not separation’ (1993: xxx). In the service of his commitment to truth and justice, Said recognized the delineation of boundaries and barriers as","PeriodicalId":46172,"journal":{"name":"Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"1 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13698010500515290","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698010500515290","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42
Abstract
Edward W. Said has advocated the crossing of boundaries while at the same time abjuring the existence of those very boundaries. In practice, this has been played out in his opposition to nationalism existing alongside his support for the Palestinian people / a relationship that many have regarded as paradoxical if not contradictory. Said’s regard for nationalist movements, as having progressive and liberatory potential, stands alongside his recognition of the bleaker, more regressive, aspects of nationalism. Narratives of nationalism sit uneasily with those of emancipation which, as Said argues, are ‘narratives of integration not separation’ (1993: xxx). In the service of his commitment to truth and justice, Said recognized the delineation of boundaries and barriers as
爱德华·w·赛义德(Edward W. Said)主张跨越边界,同时又放弃这些边界的存在。在实践中,这表现在他反对民族主义,同时支持巴勒斯坦人民,许多人认为这种关系即使不是矛盾的,也是矛盾的。赛义德认为民族主义运动具有进步和解放的潜力,同时他也认识到民族主义更悲观、更倒退的一面。正如赛义德所言,民族主义的叙述与解放主义的叙述格格不入,后者是“融合而非分离的叙述”(1993:xxx)。在他对真理和正义的承诺中,赛义德认识到边界和障碍的划定是一种