{"title":"A rite of passage","authors":"V. Fazila-Yacoobali","doi":"10.1080/13698019900510301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay draws upon the anthropological conceptualization of ‘rites of passage’ to consider the 1947 Partition of the Indian sub-continent as such a rite, into what Liisa Malkki has called the national order of things. As a rite of passage, analytically distinguished into three phases of separation, transition or limen and incorporation, Partition stories can be seen as potentially about the phase of liminality — Pakistani-Indian and not-Pakistaninot-Indian — a liminality which is both ‘structurally invisible’ and deeply threatening to the ‘stable state’ or national order. In particular this essay focuses on Pakistan, which has often been written about as if lacking a national identity, to suggest that the instability of Pakistan's nationalist narratives provide a productive opening into examining this rite of passage. It does so by exploring Muhajirs as a recalcitrant liminal category, K. K. Aziz's lament over the absence of national history writing and the constitution of Dawn as a national newspaper.","PeriodicalId":46172,"journal":{"name":"Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"183-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13698019900510301","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698019900510301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
This essay draws upon the anthropological conceptualization of ‘rites of passage’ to consider the 1947 Partition of the Indian sub-continent as such a rite, into what Liisa Malkki has called the national order of things. As a rite of passage, analytically distinguished into three phases of separation, transition or limen and incorporation, Partition stories can be seen as potentially about the phase of liminality — Pakistani-Indian and not-Pakistaninot-Indian — a liminality which is both ‘structurally invisible’ and deeply threatening to the ‘stable state’ or national order. In particular this essay focuses on Pakistan, which has often been written about as if lacking a national identity, to suggest that the instability of Pakistan's nationalist narratives provide a productive opening into examining this rite of passage. It does so by exploring Muhajirs as a recalcitrant liminal category, K. K. Aziz's lament over the absence of national history writing and the constitution of Dawn as a national newspaper.
这篇文章借鉴了“通过仪式”的人类学概念,将1947年印度次大陆的分割视为这样一种仪式,进入Liisa Malkki所说的国家秩序。作为一种仪式,从分析上分为分离、过渡或limen和合并三个阶段,分界故事可以被视为潜在的阈限阶段——巴基斯坦裔印度人和非巴基斯坦裔印度人——这种阈限既“结构上看不清”,又深深威胁着“稳定状态”或国家秩序。这篇文章特别关注巴基斯坦,它经常被描述为缺乏国家认同,这表明巴基斯坦民族主义叙事的不稳定性为研究这一仪式提供了一个富有成效的开端。它通过探索muhajir作为一个顽固的界限类别,k·k·阿齐兹(K. K. Aziz)对缺乏国家历史写作的哀叹,以及《黎明报》作为一份全国性报纸的宪法来实现这一点。