Asymmetries

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies Pub Date : 2020-09-14 DOI:10.1080/1369801x.2020.1813610
Cóilín Parsons
{"title":"Asymmetries","authors":"Cóilín Parsons","doi":"10.1080/1369801x.2020.1813610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In introducing this special issue on South African and Irish literature and culture, this essay offers a critical overview of the field of comparisons between these two former colonies. Though the cultural output of both sites is often figured as exceptional or incomparable, there is a constant drumbeat of popular comparisons between South Africa and Ireland, and the disciplines of history, political science, and conflict resolution have long compared Irish and South African trajectories in the twentieth century. Comparisons often rely on an assumed solidarity or affinity based on a shared colonial history, but the radically different economic and political realities of the two sites make such assumptions unstable. This introduction suggests it is time for a more nuanced set of comparative studies that recognize the profoundly asymmetrical relations between South Africa and Ireland, as well as the potential limits of comparative practice, and yet the gains from bringing together two anomalous postcolonial case studies. Drawing on the work of Peter D. McDonald, the essay makes a case for listening carefully to the idiosyncrasies of a “tangled archive” of South African–Irish relations in order to shed light on what postcolonial comparison might look like in the twenty-first century.","PeriodicalId":46172,"journal":{"name":"Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1369801x.2020.1813610","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventions-International Journal of Postcolonial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801x.2020.1813610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In introducing this special issue on South African and Irish literature and culture, this essay offers a critical overview of the field of comparisons between these two former colonies. Though the cultural output of both sites is often figured as exceptional or incomparable, there is a constant drumbeat of popular comparisons between South Africa and Ireland, and the disciplines of history, political science, and conflict resolution have long compared Irish and South African trajectories in the twentieth century. Comparisons often rely on an assumed solidarity or affinity based on a shared colonial history, but the radically different economic and political realities of the two sites make such assumptions unstable. This introduction suggests it is time for a more nuanced set of comparative studies that recognize the profoundly asymmetrical relations between South Africa and Ireland, as well as the potential limits of comparative practice, and yet the gains from bringing together two anomalous postcolonial case studies. Drawing on the work of Peter D. McDonald, the essay makes a case for listening carefully to the idiosyncrasies of a “tangled archive” of South African–Irish relations in order to shed light on what postcolonial comparison might look like in the twenty-first century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不对称
在介绍这个关于南非和爱尔兰文学和文化的特刊时,本文对这两个前殖民地之间的比较领域提供了一个批判性的概述。虽然这两个地方的文化产出通常被认为是特殊的或无法比拟的,但南非和爱尔兰之间的比较一直很流行,历史、政治科学和冲突解决等学科长期以来一直在比较爱尔兰和南非在20世纪的发展轨迹。比较通常依赖于基于共同殖民历史的假设的团结或亲近感,但两个地点的经济和政治现实截然不同,使得这种假设不稳定。这篇引言表明,现在是时候进行一组更细致的比较研究,认识到南非和爱尔兰之间深刻的不对称关系,以及比较实践的潜在局限性,然而,将两个异常的后殖民案例研究结合在一起会有所收获。这篇文章借鉴了彼得·d·麦克唐纳(Peter D. McDonald)的作品,仔细倾听南非与爱尔兰关系“错综复杂的档案”的特质,以阐明二十一世纪后殖民时期的比较可能是什么样子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Roman Routes in Italian Postcolonial Women Writers Palestine 2048 in Inertia: False Utopias, A Dwindling Nation, and the Last Palestinian Decolonizing Language Resources in The Human-Machine Era Showcasing Italianness Through Migration Governance Negotiating the Carceral Space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1