Shopping Versus Growing: Food Acquisition Habits of Dutch Urban Gardeners

IF 1.1 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Food and Foodways Pub Date : 2014-10-02 DOI:10.1080/07409710.2014.964604
E. Veen, P.H.M. Derkzen, Andries J. Visser
{"title":"Shopping Versus Growing: Food Acquisition Habits of Dutch Urban Gardeners","authors":"E. Veen, P.H.M. Derkzen, Andries J. Visser","doi":"10.1080/07409710.2014.964604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we explore how urban food growing gets interwoven with other areas of life and show how this differs between people actively engaged in gardening and people not or only limitedly involved. We compare four urban food-growing initiatives: two allotments and two Alternative Food Networks (AFNs); the AFNs do not require active participation. Using the theory of practice, we show that allotment gardeners are mainly involved in the practice of gardening. Having responsibility over a garden stimulates them to perform the gardening practice, turning it into a routine that has its place in everyday life. As a result, the harvest is easily integrated in the daily meal. Members of the AFNs studied engage in the practice of shopping. These AFNs therefore remain in competition with more convenient food acquisition venues such as supermarkets and members have difficulty eating from them regularly. We conclude that whether members are involved in shopping or growing impacts the degree to which they manage to eat urban-grown food. This also implies that motivations to change the current food system “only go so far”; such motivations are embedded in the context of everyday life, in which routines may forego conscious choices.","PeriodicalId":45423,"journal":{"name":"Food and Foodways","volume":"22 1","pages":"268 - 299"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07409710.2014.964604","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Foodways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710.2014.964604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In this article, we explore how urban food growing gets interwoven with other areas of life and show how this differs between people actively engaged in gardening and people not or only limitedly involved. We compare four urban food-growing initiatives: two allotments and two Alternative Food Networks (AFNs); the AFNs do not require active participation. Using the theory of practice, we show that allotment gardeners are mainly involved in the practice of gardening. Having responsibility over a garden stimulates them to perform the gardening practice, turning it into a routine that has its place in everyday life. As a result, the harvest is easily integrated in the daily meal. Members of the AFNs studied engage in the practice of shopping. These AFNs therefore remain in competition with more convenient food acquisition venues such as supermarkets and members have difficulty eating from them regularly. We conclude that whether members are involved in shopping or growing impacts the degree to which they manage to eat urban-grown food. This also implies that motivations to change the current food system “only go so far”; such motivations are embedded in the context of everyday life, in which routines may forego conscious choices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
购物与种植:荷兰城市园丁的食物获取习惯
在这篇文章中,我们探讨了城市食物种植是如何与其他生活领域交织在一起的,并展示了积极从事园艺的人和不参与或只有限参与的人之间的区别。我们比较了四个城市粮食种植计划:两个分配和两个替代食品网络(afn);afn不需要积极参与。运用实践理论,揭示了园艺师主要参与园艺学实践。对花园负责刺激他们进行园艺实践,把它变成一种日常生活中的例行公事。因此,收获很容易融入日常膳食中。被研究的afn成员从事购物实践。因此,这些afn仍然与超市等更方便的食品获取场所竞争,会员很难定期从它们那里吃饭。我们得出的结论是,成员是否参与购物或种植影响他们设法吃城市种植的食物的程度。这也意味着,改变当前粮食体系的动机“只能到此为止”;这样的动机是嵌入在日常生活的背景下的,在日常生活中,例行公事可能会放弃有意识的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Foodways
Food and Foodways ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Food and Foodways is a refereed, interdisciplinary, and international journal devoted to publishing original scholarly articles on the history and culture of human nourishment. By reflecting on the role food plays in human relations, this unique journal explores the powerful but often subtle ways in which food has shaped, and shapes, our lives socially, economically, politically, mentally, nutritionally, and morally. Because food is a pervasive social phenomenon, it cannot be approached by any one discipline. We encourage articles that engage dialogue, debate, and exchange across disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Dinner under the camel thorn trees: The safari tourist’s travel back in time A taste of freedom: in-cell group cooking and culinary redemption in an Israeli prison North-Atlantic gastrotourism on the move: constructing the Faroe Islands as a food destination The Chile is my uncle: Spicy kinship between humans and more-than-humans in the Sikkimese Himalayas Hunting, foraging and the pursuit of animal ontologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1