Accuracy of Prick Skin Tests for Ingestant Hypersensitivity Diagnosis

K. Eaton
{"title":"Accuracy of Prick Skin Tests for Ingestant Hypersensitivity Diagnosis","authors":"K. Eaton","doi":"10.1080/13590840410001734901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accuracy of the modified prick skin test (Pepys) for the diagnosis of food sensitivity reactions was evaluated, noting both immediate and delayed responses. Single‐blind tests were performed on 19 patients who had stable patterns of responsiveness to elimination and repeated open food challenges. Foods to which the patients were sensitized were tested, together with an equal number of foods to which (by challenge) the patient had been shown not to be sensitive. Skin test responses were compared with those to the open food challenges, the latter of which are assumed to be accurate. Using these criteria, the prick skin test had an accuracy of only 28%, with the best two extracts (cow's milk and cheese) scoring respectively 7 correct and 4 incorrect results and 6 correct and 2 incorrect results. The least accurate extracts were pork and sugar, scoring respectively 2 correct and 8 incorrect results, and 1 correct and 5 incorrect results. The author concludes that the modifed prick skin test is not a valid...","PeriodicalId":88013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nutritional & environmental medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"79-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13590840410001734901","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nutritional & environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13590840410001734901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The accuracy of the modified prick skin test (Pepys) for the diagnosis of food sensitivity reactions was evaluated, noting both immediate and delayed responses. Single‐blind tests were performed on 19 patients who had stable patterns of responsiveness to elimination and repeated open food challenges. Foods to which the patients were sensitized were tested, together with an equal number of foods to which (by challenge) the patient had been shown not to be sensitive. Skin test responses were compared with those to the open food challenges, the latter of which are assumed to be accurate. Using these criteria, the prick skin test had an accuracy of only 28%, with the best two extracts (cow's milk and cheese) scoring respectively 7 correct and 4 incorrect results and 6 correct and 2 incorrect results. The least accurate extracts were pork and sugar, scoring respectively 2 correct and 8 incorrect results, and 1 correct and 5 incorrect results. The author concludes that the modifed prick skin test is not a valid...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刺破皮肤试验对摄食过敏诊断的准确性
改进的点刺皮肤试验(Pepys)诊断食物敏感反应的准确性进行了评估,注意到即时和延迟反应。对19例患者进行了单盲试验,这些患者对排除法和反复的开放性食物挑战有稳定的反应模式。对患者过敏的食物进行了测试,同时对患者显示不敏感的食物(通过挑战)进行了测试。皮肤测试的反应与开放食物挑战的反应进行了比较,后者被认为是准确的。使用这些标准,点刺皮肤试验的准确性仅为28%,最好的两种提取物(牛奶和奶酪)分别获得7个正确结果和4个错误结果,6个正确结果和2个错误结果。准确度最低的提取物为猪肉和糖,正确2次,错误8次,正确1次,错误5次。作者认为,改进的刺皮试验不是一种有效的试验方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recent progress on magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Samarkand, Uzbekistan Pharmacokinetics of oral vitamin C Small colony variants of staphylococci: Pathogenesis and evolutionary significance in causing and sustaining problematic human infections Survey of total folate intake at conception and assessment of impact of fortification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1