Armenians beyond diaspora: Making Lebanon their own

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Mediterranean Politics Pub Date : 2021-10-11 DOI:10.1080/13629395.2021.1989743
Sean Lee
{"title":"Armenians beyond diaspora: Making Lebanon their own","authors":"Sean Lee","doi":"10.1080/13629395.2021.1989743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"decades? In filling these theoretical and empirical gaps, the author adopts a doublepaired comparison of individuals’ emotions, decisions, and behaviours towards calls for public protests against incumbent rulers in Egypt and Morocco. The author utilizes examples of public mobilization in two Arab regimes, where the outcome of public mobilization was different. This emphasizes the importance of public mobilization against authoritarian leaders in different autocratic settings. To support this argument, the author uses a combination of three methodologies, an ethnographic study based on face-to-face interviews with a selection of respondents from different age groups and socioeconomic backgrounds, speech analysis, and the examination of social media content, mainly Facebook. By analysing members’ interactions on two Facebook groups, We Are All Khaled Said and le mouvement du 20 février, the author depicts participants’ emotions and infers motives related to the improvement of socioeconomic conditions, the consolidation of political and individual freedom, and the assertion of human dignity, behind their engagement in protests against authoritarian regimes in Egypt and Morocco. The author investigates these Facebook groups’ discussions in addition to the in person interviews she conducted with various actors to identify factors that generate both positive emotions and negative emotions. Then, she explains how these emotions and motives lead to either participation or disengagement from protest activities. This book provides a concise and synthetized study on the impact of emotions on individuals’ behaviours and decisions towards participation in protests against authoritarian regimes. In doing so, it sheds light on the reasoning process underlining emotions’ impact on individual decisions of engagement or disengagement into protests. It is a singular, rich, and novel study in the field of Social Movement Theories and Political Psychology, and hence, should be a guiding reference for scholars and students specialized in these fields in general and in the Middle East and North Africa in particular.","PeriodicalId":46666,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Politics","volume":"28 1","pages":"522 - 524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2021.1989743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

decades? In filling these theoretical and empirical gaps, the author adopts a doublepaired comparison of individuals’ emotions, decisions, and behaviours towards calls for public protests against incumbent rulers in Egypt and Morocco. The author utilizes examples of public mobilization in two Arab regimes, where the outcome of public mobilization was different. This emphasizes the importance of public mobilization against authoritarian leaders in different autocratic settings. To support this argument, the author uses a combination of three methodologies, an ethnographic study based on face-to-face interviews with a selection of respondents from different age groups and socioeconomic backgrounds, speech analysis, and the examination of social media content, mainly Facebook. By analysing members’ interactions on two Facebook groups, We Are All Khaled Said and le mouvement du 20 février, the author depicts participants’ emotions and infers motives related to the improvement of socioeconomic conditions, the consolidation of political and individual freedom, and the assertion of human dignity, behind their engagement in protests against authoritarian regimes in Egypt and Morocco. The author investigates these Facebook groups’ discussions in addition to the in person interviews she conducted with various actors to identify factors that generate both positive emotions and negative emotions. Then, she explains how these emotions and motives lead to either participation or disengagement from protest activities. This book provides a concise and synthetized study on the impact of emotions on individuals’ behaviours and decisions towards participation in protests against authoritarian regimes. In doing so, it sheds light on the reasoning process underlining emotions’ impact on individual decisions of engagement or disengagement into protests. It is a singular, rich, and novel study in the field of Social Movement Theories and Political Psychology, and hence, should be a guiding reference for scholars and students specialized in these fields in general and in the Middle East and North Africa in particular.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚美尼亚人远离流散:让黎巴嫩成为自己的家园
几十年?为了填补这些理论和经验上的空白,作者采用了一种双重对比的方法,比较了埃及和摩洛哥民众对反对现任统治者的公众抗议的情绪、决定和行为。作者利用了两个阿拉伯政权的公众动员的例子,在那里,公众动员的结果是不同的。这强调了在不同的专制环境中动员公众反对专制领导人的重要性。为了支持这一论点,作者使用了三种方法的组合,一种基于面对面访谈的民族志研究,选择了来自不同年龄组和社会经济背景的受访者,语音分析,以及对社交媒体内容(主要是Facebook)的检查。作者通过分析成员在两个Facebook群组(We Are All Khaled Said和le movement du 20 fsamvrier)上的互动,描绘了参与者的情绪,并推断出他们参与抗议埃及和摩洛哥独裁政权背后的动机,这些动机与改善社会经济条件、巩固政治和个人自由以及维护人类尊严有关。作者调查了这些Facebook小组的讨论,以及她对各种演员进行的亲自采访,以确定产生积极情绪和消极情绪的因素。然后,她解释了这些情绪和动机是如何导致参与或脱离抗议活动的。这本书提供了一个简洁和综合的研究情绪对个人的行为和决定的影响,参与抗议独裁政权。在这样做的过程中,它揭示了强调情绪对参与或不参与抗议的个人决定的影响的推理过程。在社会运动理论和政治心理学领域,这是一个独特的、丰富的、新颖的研究,因此,应该是专门研究这些领域的学者和学生的指导参考,特别是在中东和北非。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Mediterranean Politics is the only refereed academic journal to focus on the politics, international relations and political economy of the entire Mediterranean area - "Mediterranean" here being understood to refer to all those countries whose borders are defined partially or wholly by the Mediterranean Sea. This focus involves consideration not only of the region itself, but also the significance of developments there for other parts of the world. The journal analyses the central issues that concern Mediterranean countries and assesses both local and international responses to them. While its prime concern is with political developments, the focus of Mediterranean Politics extends to all the factors and dimensions affecting political life.
期刊最新文献
European neighbourhood policy, the Bologna model and EU-Egyptian cooperation in Higher Education Reframing coercive engineered migration theory: Ceuta and the Western Sahara Measuring ‘state-diffusion’ in post-conflict authoritarian Syria evidence from the 2021 public opinion survey Connecting security with sustainable development in the Eastern Mediterranean and generating pay-offs for the European Union ‘Quietist’ Salafis after the ‘Arab revolts’ in Algeria and Libya (2011–2019): Between insecurity and political subordination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1