Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Travel Sketches and Samuel P. Newman’s A Practical System of Rhetoric: A Case of American Belletristic Theory on Praxis

Q1 Arts and Humanities Advances in the History of Rhetoric Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI:10.1080/15362426.2016.1192518
B. Hewett, Erin Singer
{"title":"Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Travel Sketches and Samuel P. Newman’s A Practical System of Rhetoric: A Case of American Belletristic Theory on Praxis","authors":"B. Hewett, Erin Singer","doi":"10.1080/15362426.2016.1192518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Historical study of teachers and students reveals how rhetorical theories influence writers (McClish 2015). This case study of Nathaniel Hawthorne’s prose considers the nineteenth-century rhetorical teachings of Samuel Phillips Newman, Hawthorne’s professor at Bowdoin College, a student of Blair, and a proponent of rhetorical taste. Using Newman’s 1827 A Practical System of Rhetoric and Hawthorne’s 1832 travel sketches, we analyze Newman’s influences on Hawthorne—particularly taste and the sublime and how these concepts challenged Hawthorne as a writer in the travel sketch genre. We consider Newman’s influences on Hawthorne as evidenced by writing practices that Newman had recommended or disapproved. In particular, we examine Newman’s explanation of taste and its complementary construct of sublimity and how these concepts challenged Hawthorne. We argue that Hawthorne both wrote within the paradigm of rhetorical taste as Newman taught it and struggled against its constraints to find his own perceptions. Furthermore, we see this struggle happening within the context of Hawthorne’s exposure to Newman’s American-inflected belletrism that emphasized both a discriminatory principle of taste and the growing body of American literature.","PeriodicalId":38049,"journal":{"name":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","volume":"19 1","pages":"298 - 320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15362426.2016.1192518","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2016.1192518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Historical study of teachers and students reveals how rhetorical theories influence writers (McClish 2015). This case study of Nathaniel Hawthorne’s prose considers the nineteenth-century rhetorical teachings of Samuel Phillips Newman, Hawthorne’s professor at Bowdoin College, a student of Blair, and a proponent of rhetorical taste. Using Newman’s 1827 A Practical System of Rhetoric and Hawthorne’s 1832 travel sketches, we analyze Newman’s influences on Hawthorne—particularly taste and the sublime and how these concepts challenged Hawthorne as a writer in the travel sketch genre. We consider Newman’s influences on Hawthorne as evidenced by writing practices that Newman had recommended or disapproved. In particular, we examine Newman’s explanation of taste and its complementary construct of sublimity and how these concepts challenged Hawthorne. We argue that Hawthorne both wrote within the paradigm of rhetorical taste as Newman taught it and struggled against its constraints to find his own perceptions. Furthermore, we see this struggle happening within the context of Hawthorne’s exposure to Newman’s American-inflected belletrism that emphasized both a discriminatory principle of taste and the growing body of American literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
霍桑的《旅行小品》与纽曼的《实用修辞体系》——以美国文学实践理论为例
对教师和学生的历史研究揭示了修辞理论如何影响作家(McClish 2015)。这个关于纳撒尼尔·霍桑散文的案例研究考虑了塞缪尔·菲利普斯·纽曼19世纪的修辞教学,纽曼是霍桑在鲍登学院的教授,布莱尔的学生,也是修辞品味的支持者。本文以纽曼1827年的《实用修辞学》和霍桑1832年的游记为例,分析纽曼对霍桑的影响,尤其是品味和崇高,以及这些观念对霍桑作为游记作家的挑战。我们认为纽曼对霍桑的影响可以通过纽曼推荐或不赞成的写作方式来证明。特别地,我们研究纽曼对品味的解释及其对崇高的补充结构,以及这些概念如何挑战霍桑。我们认为,霍桑既在纽曼教授的修辞品味范式内写作,又在其约束下努力寻找自己的看法。此外,我们看到这种斗争发生在霍桑接触纽曼的美国风格的韵文的背景下,这种韵文强调了品味的歧视原则和美国文学的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Advances in the History of Rhetoric Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
“Anarchy in the USA”: Win McNamee’s Capitol Riot Photographs and the Rhetoric of Desecration Museums in Motu in the Anthropocene: From Active Space to Spatial Actions Feminist Movements: The Role of Coalition, Travel, and Labor in the Third World Women’s Alliance The Moves of Civil Rights: Examining the 1957 Prayer Pilgrimage for Freedom Phantom Mobility: Coercion, Conversion, and Letter Writing in Colonial Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1