The Call from Afar: A Heideggerian–Lacanian rereading of Ibsen’s The Lady from the Sea

Pub Date : 2015-07-03 DOI:10.1080/15021866.2015.1117854
H. Zwart
{"title":"The Call from Afar: A Heideggerian–Lacanian rereading of Ibsen’s The Lady from the Sea","authors":"H. Zwart","doi":"10.1080/15021866.2015.1117854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Lady from the Sea, written in 1888, is a compelling portrayal of fin-de-siecle marital existence and structured like a therapy, featuring Ellida Wangel as a ‘patient’, haunted by reminiscences concerning a mysterious sailor and tormented by desire for a different mode of existence, closer to the sea. Although the therapeutic design is clearly present, another possible reading shifts the focus from front-stage to backdrop and from the therapeutic talking sessions to the ambiance: not the decor (the Norwegian coastal-provincial scenery, the panoramic landscape), but rather that which lies beyond it: the invisible, un-representable, unseeable sea. What is the ‘sea’ in Ibsen’s play? And what exactly is this fatal attraction to which Ellida has fallen victim? To address these questions, Ibsen’s play will be subjected to three subsequent readings. The first one focusses on the play as therapy, directed at strengthening Ellida’s ego in confrontation with the Id (‘Es’). Subsequently, the play will be read from a Heideggerian perspective. The reading direction will be reversed, from the (successful?) therapeutic outcome to the chronic discontent pervading the drama from the very start, and from modern human existence to primordial nature. The focus will be on what Heidegger thematises as the Call of Conscience in Being and Time, and in his later writings as the Call of primordial Nature. Finally, a Lacanian reading allows me to bridge the Freudian and the Heideggerian approaches, presenting Ellida as an ‘amphibian’ (divided) subject, who not only produces an intriguing parable concerning our amphibian origins (as an explanation of pervasive human discontent), but eventually comes face to face with the ultimate object-cause of her desire: the Stranger’s uncanny, mesmerizing eyes: an encounter at the edges of the symbolic order, challenging her to come to terms with the unsettling Real.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15021866.2015.1117854","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021866.2015.1117854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Lady from the Sea, written in 1888, is a compelling portrayal of fin-de-siecle marital existence and structured like a therapy, featuring Ellida Wangel as a ‘patient’, haunted by reminiscences concerning a mysterious sailor and tormented by desire for a different mode of existence, closer to the sea. Although the therapeutic design is clearly present, another possible reading shifts the focus from front-stage to backdrop and from the therapeutic talking sessions to the ambiance: not the decor (the Norwegian coastal-provincial scenery, the panoramic landscape), but rather that which lies beyond it: the invisible, un-representable, unseeable sea. What is the ‘sea’ in Ibsen’s play? And what exactly is this fatal attraction to which Ellida has fallen victim? To address these questions, Ibsen’s play will be subjected to three subsequent readings. The first one focusses on the play as therapy, directed at strengthening Ellida’s ego in confrontation with the Id (‘Es’). Subsequently, the play will be read from a Heideggerian perspective. The reading direction will be reversed, from the (successful?) therapeutic outcome to the chronic discontent pervading the drama from the very start, and from modern human existence to primordial nature. The focus will be on what Heidegger thematises as the Call of Conscience in Being and Time, and in his later writings as the Call of primordial Nature. Finally, a Lacanian reading allows me to bridge the Freudian and the Heideggerian approaches, presenting Ellida as an ‘amphibian’ (divided) subject, who not only produces an intriguing parable concerning our amphibian origins (as an explanation of pervasive human discontent), but eventually comes face to face with the ultimate object-cause of her desire: the Stranger’s uncanny, mesmerizing eyes: an encounter at the edges of the symbolic order, challenging her to come to terms with the unsettling Real.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
来自远方的呼唤:海德格尔-拉康式对易卜生《来自海上的女人》的重读
《来自海上的女人》写于1888年,是对世纪末婚姻生活的引人注目的描绘,其结构就像一种治疗,埃莉达·旺格尔(Ellida Wangel)饰演的“病人”被一个神秘水手的回忆所困扰,被一种更接近大海的不同生活方式的渴望所折磨。虽然治疗的设计很明显,但另一种可能的解读将焦点从前台转移到背景,从治疗谈话转移到氛围:不是装饰(挪威沿海省的风景,全景景观),而是超越它的东西:看不见的,无法表达的,不可见的海洋。易卜生戏剧中的“海”是什么?究竟是什么致命的吸引力使埃莉达成为受害者?为了回答这些问题,易卜生的剧本将在接下来的三篇文章中被解读。第一个重点是戏剧作为治疗,旨在加强埃莉达的自我对抗本我(“Es”)。接下来,我们将从海德格尔的视角来解读这部戏剧。阅读方向将被逆转,从(成功的?)治疗结果到从一开始就弥漫在戏剧中的慢性不满,从现代人类存在到原始自然。重点将放在海德格尔在《存在与时间》以及他后来的作品《原初自然的呼唤》中主题化的良知召唤。最后,拉康的解读让我能够将弗洛伊德和海德格尔的方法连接起来,将埃莉达呈现为一个“两栖动物”(分裂的)主体,她不仅产生了一个关于我们两栖动物起源的有趣寓言(作为对普遍存在的人类不满的解释),而且最终与她欲望的最终客体原因面对面:陌生人的神秘,迷人的眼睛:在象征秩序的边缘相遇,挑战她与令人不安的现实妥协。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1