Test‐retest reliability of the learning and study strategies inventory (lassi): New evidence

Lamont A. Flowers
{"title":"Test‐retest reliability of the learning and study strategies inventory (lassi): New evidence","authors":"Lamont A. Flowers","doi":"10.1080/19388070309558399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reports the results of a test‐retest reliability study that was conducted to determine the extent to which scale scores obtained from the first edition of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) were stable and provided consistent measures of students’ knowledge and use of study skills. When compared to an earlier test‐retest reliability study (Weinstein, 1987), the findings from the present study suggested that LASSI scale scores might yield inconsistent or unstable scores for at‐risk students.","PeriodicalId":88664,"journal":{"name":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","volume":"43 1","pages":"31 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070309558399","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070309558399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Abstract This article reports the results of a test‐retest reliability study that was conducted to determine the extent to which scale scores obtained from the first edition of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) were stable and provided consistent measures of students’ knowledge and use of study skills. When compared to an earlier test‐retest reliability study (Weinstein, 1987), the findings from the present study suggested that LASSI scale scores might yield inconsistent or unstable scores for at‐risk students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习和学习策略量表(lassi)的重测信度:新证据
摘要本文报告了一项测试-重测信度研究的结果,该研究旨在确定第一版学习和学习策略量表(LASSI)的量表分数在多大程度上是稳定的,并提供了学生知识和学习技能使用的一致衡量标准。与早期的重测信度研究(Weinstein, 1987)相比,本研究的结果表明,LASSI量表得分可能会对有风险的学生产生不一致或不稳定的分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Five-year Pan-European, longitudinal surveillance of Clostridium difficile ribotype prevalence and antimicrobial resistance: the extended ClosER study. Bringing television back to the bedroom: Transactions between a seventh grade struggling reader and her mathematics teacher “Kiss your brain”: A closer look at flourishing literacy gains in impoverished elementary schools “I talk them through it”: Teacher mediation of picturebooks with sparse verbal text during whole‐class readalouds Becoming technologically literate through technology integration in PK‐12 preservice literacy courses: Three case studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1