On the road to literature discussion groups: Teacher scaffolding during preparatory experiences

Beth Maloch
{"title":"On the road to literature discussion groups: Teacher scaffolding during preparatory experiences","authors":"Beth Maloch","doi":"10.1080/19388070409558424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Working within a theoretical framework of sociocultural theory, with a particular focus on the construct of scaffolding, this five and a half month qualitative study explored the ways in which one third‐grade teacher supported students’ move towards literature discussion groups. Data sources including expanded field notes, video and audiotape records, teacher interview transcripts, and artifacts were analyzed utilizing the constant‐comparative method. Findings indicated two prominent themes related to the instructional focus of the teacher's scaffolding during preparatory activities—a response‐oriented focus and an interpersonal focus. By focusing on these two areas, the teacher facilitated students’ acquisition of response strategies and interpersonal strategies— strategies they later used effectively in literature discussion groups.","PeriodicalId":88664,"journal":{"name":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","volume":"44 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070409558424","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070409558424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Abstract Working within a theoretical framework of sociocultural theory, with a particular focus on the construct of scaffolding, this five and a half month qualitative study explored the ways in which one third‐grade teacher supported students’ move towards literature discussion groups. Data sources including expanded field notes, video and audiotape records, teacher interview transcripts, and artifacts were analyzed utilizing the constant‐comparative method. Findings indicated two prominent themes related to the instructional focus of the teacher's scaffolding during preparatory activities—a response‐oriented focus and an interpersonal focus. By focusing on these two areas, the teacher facilitated students’ acquisition of response strategies and interpersonal strategies— strategies they later used effectively in literature discussion groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文学讨论小组之路:预备阶段的教师脚手架体验
在社会文化理论的理论框架内,特别关注脚手架的构建,这项为期五个半月的定性研究探讨了一位三年级教师支持学生走向文学讨论小组的方式。数据来源包括扩展的现场记录、视频和录音带记录、教师访谈记录和人工制品,使用恒定比较方法进行分析。研究结果表明,在准备活动中,教师脚手架的教学重点有两个突出的主题——反应导向的重点和人际关系的重点。通过关注这两个方面,老师促进了学生对反应策略和人际策略的习得——他们后来在文学讨论小组中有效地使用了这些策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Five-year Pan-European, longitudinal surveillance of Clostridium difficile ribotype prevalence and antimicrobial resistance: the extended ClosER study. Bringing television back to the bedroom: Transactions between a seventh grade struggling reader and her mathematics teacher “Kiss your brain”: A closer look at flourishing literacy gains in impoverished elementary schools “I talk them through it”: Teacher mediation of picturebooks with sparse verbal text during whole‐class readalouds Becoming technologically literate through technology integration in PK‐12 preservice literacy courses: Three case studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1